Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5474
Next month in: 00:26:07
Server time: 07:33:52, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Green Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Narik Nationalist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 3065

Description[?]:

......

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:12:40, January 20, 2011 CET
FromLibertarian Socialist Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Green Bill
MessageWhile we can appreciate the sentiment of this bill. I am sorry that we cannot support it as it does put too many limits on the civil rights of citizens. Perhaps we can tweak these to allow for more freedom for citizens and reach a safe compromise.

Date22:17:32, January 20, 2011 CET
FromCommunist Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Green Bill
MessageThe CPD backs fully the comments made by the LSPD

Date22:24:14, January 20, 2011 CET
FromNarik Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Green Bill
MessageHow would you tweak it? I want this bill to pass...

Date23:14:49, January 20, 2011 CET
FromLibertarian Socialist Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Green Bill
MessageA flat law against the killing of animals can be a tad silly. For the most part killing animals for food and by accident are not worth being crimes. Hunting within regulation is not harmful to the environment, and animals even extends to insects. So Article one would be both impossible to enforce and divert real efforts from another direction such as catching poachers or industrial environmental damage killing animals.

Article 2 is alright. I could get behind such an initiative.

Article 3 is a hard one as ti does impose too much restriction on the civil rights of Darnussians. I liked the incentive system but maybe a requirement to have environmentally safe fuels could work, but an outright ban on the citizen's rights to own a car is impractical.

Date02:06:16, January 21, 2011 CET
FromImperia Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Green Bill
Messagearent anrachist suppose to have no rules?

Date03:11:58, January 21, 2011 CET
FromConservative Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Green Bill
MessageThey appear to be preservationists not anarchists.

Date23:59:08, January 21, 2011 CET
FromNarik Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Green Bill
MessageWe are anarchists but a very specific kind. We are minarchists who support preserving our envrionrment so we have no need for an invasive government. As far as preserving our environment goes, this includes wildlife, climate and race. If we are all a happy, normal people, and we live equally with our surroundings, then and only then can we live without an oppressive system called "government".


subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 54

no
      

Total Seats: 647

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: "Doxxing", or the publishing of personally identifiable information about another player without permission, is forbidden.

    Random quote: "Morality is simply the attitude we adopt towards people whom we personally dislike." - Oscar Wilde

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 73