Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5474
Next month in: 02:15:07
Server time: 01:44:52, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military Reconstruction Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Nationalen Freiheitliche Bund

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 3071

Description[?]:

To unify, strengthen and empower our military, to make sure it will protect the liberties of Dorvik and its citizens.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:17:00, February 04, 2011 CET
From.
ToDebating the Military Reconstruction Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

We cannot conceive any circumstances where it would be right to use weapons of mass destruction.

Date13:13:43, February 04, 2011 CET
FromBürgerlichen Soziale Union
ToDebating the Military Reconstruction Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

What you are trying to impose is unacceptable by our party. Weapons of mass destruction should be used at their minimum and only if they are absolutely necessary.

Date20:01:42, February 04, 2011 CET
FromAllianz für Dorvik
ToDebating the Military Reconstruction Act
MessageMr. Speaker,
This nation's military should not be limited by the "morals" of some politician in the capital. They should have all resources available to them in times of war.
I yield.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 227

no
   

Total Seats: 273

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

    Random quote: "An idealist is one who, on noticing that roses smell better than a cabbage, concludes that it will also make better soup." - H. L. Mencken

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 59