Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5474
Next month in: 02:52:20
Server time: 05:07:39, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Third Fair Economy Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Socio-Democratic Union

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2142

Description[?]:

Noticing that no regulations exists in the telephone industry and that operators can charge their customers with excessive rates, the SDU proposes, in the same fashion as the First Fair Economy Bill, that telephone rates are regulated by the State.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:10:03, November 16, 2005 CET
FromDolgarian Imperial Revivalists
ToDebating the Third Fair Economy Bill
MessageHas anyone actually seen how appaling our telecommunications network actually is? Even in Lirath, there is little or no reliable phone service at all...

Date22:05:37, November 16, 2005 CET
FromAlianse Progresivitāte
ToDebating the Third Fair Economy Bill
MessageAnd I'm sure requiring the providers to charge less will allow them more capital to build the infrastructure we need, right?

Date22:40:06, November 16, 2005 CET
FromMovement for White Supremacy
ToDebating the Third Fair Economy Bill
MessageDUP where do you find all this information about

"Even in Lirath, there is little or no reliable phone service at all..."

Date22:56:20, November 16, 2005 CET
FromLiberty and Prosperity Party
ToDebating the Third Fair Economy Bill
MessageI think he assumes it. If you look at the county overviews, you'll notice the infrastructure (railroads, road, communications, and such) are in terrible condition everywhere.

By all standards, we have a terribly underdeveloped nation... >.<

Date02:08:16, November 17, 2005 CET
FromAlianse Progresivitāte
ToDebating the Third Fair Economy Bill
MessageWhich is why I want to invest in infrastructure in our budget. But this ain't the way to do it. ;-)

Date04:08:28, November 17, 2005 CET
FromMovement for White Supremacy
ToDebating the Third Fair Economy Bill
Messageok, well since DUP increased our taxes by like 250%, we can spend our 2 Trillion dollar surplus solely on infrastructure.

Date08:09:49, November 17, 2005 CET
FromDolgarian Imperial Revivalists
ToDebating the Third Fair Economy Bill
MessageSpending on things has no effect at the moment, I do believe that all movments (population, development, health, crime, etc...) are merely random in nature.

So, we are all basically arguing about nothing more than a principle. In fact, I don't think that taxation and spending bills even have any kind of effect on visibility....

We would actually prefer subsidising the phone service to rural areas BTW, at least for a time. Once the system is up and running then all you need do is ensure that companies have an obligation to provide a service, and that they charge the same rate regardless of geographical location.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
     

Total Seats: 581

abstain
  

Total Seats: 169


Random fact: It is not allowed to call more than 5 elections in 5 game years in a nation. The default sanction for a player persisting in the early election tactic will be a seat reset.

Random quote: "Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people." - Karl Marx

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 63