Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5474
Next month in: 02:27:15
Server time: 17:32:44, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): ADM Drax | GLNBei | hyraemous | Mity1 | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Recreational Drug Use Reform

Details

Submitted by[?]: Likaton Fascist Front

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2143

Description[?]:

Currently there are no laws governing what citizens can put into their bodies. PSS proposes that local governments, ever sensitive to prevailing community attitudes be allowed to legislate in their immediate areas of control.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:48:41, November 17, 2005 CET
FromAM Radical Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Recreational Drug Use Reform
MessageAs long as the truth in labeling laws are enforced, the citizens are quite capable of deciding for themselves what to put into their bodies. They do not need a paternalistic local government to tell them, any more than they need a national government for this.

Date02:35:32, November 18, 2005 CET
FromFront for State Prosperity
ToDebating the Recreational Drug Use Reform
MessageWe agree with the RLP.

Date05:59:55, November 18, 2005 CET
FromRepresentative Party
ToDebating the Recreational Drug Use Reform
MessageWe don't think this matter should be left to local governments. Variations in drugs laws between regions could lead to opportunities that could be exploited easily by criminal syndicates.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 179

no
    

Total Seats: 283

abstain
  

Total Seats: 38


Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining.

Random quote: Although I understand and respect the intentions behind the gesture, this is not something that is universally understood or appreciated, and it tends to give out a negative impression of our party. ~ Anton Weinreich, General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party, pleading with his members to stop burning the national flag

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 54