Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5474
Next month in: 00:00:13
Server time: 03:59:46, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Siffrin | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Income tax proposal of July 3087

Details

Submitted by[?]: Darnussian Reform Conservative Alliance

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes to change income taxes. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 3088

Description[?]:

The Darnussian Reform Conservative Alliance propose to adjust the government's income tax policy to better address the economic situation of the Second Darnussian Democratic Republic.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:31:58, March 09, 2011 CET
FromImperia Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of July 3087
Messagelike 1 and 2

Date14:35:35, March 09, 2011 CET
FromCommunist Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of July 3087
MessagePure disgusting.

Shifting the tax burden from rich to poor.

Date18:08:05, March 09, 2011 CET
FromDarnussian Reform Conservative Alliance
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of July 3087
MessageShifting from tax on productivity and saving to tax on consumption.

Date19:22:33, March 09, 2011 CET
FromCommunist Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of July 3087
MessageAlso known as shifting the tax burden from rich to poor.

Date21:53:51, March 09, 2011 CET
FromDarnussian Reform Conservative Alliance
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of July 3087
Messagerich people buy more.This allows the poor to save.

Date00:29:31, March 10, 2011 CET
FromLiberty Party
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of July 3087
MessageWho is the judge of what is considered luxury and what is essential?

Date03:48:27, March 10, 2011 CET
FromCL Party
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of July 3087
MessageFirst of all that is greater than 10 000 not less. Second reducing the percentage from 12 to 10 percent great idea means more revenue because more people will spend money. Simple mathematics.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 428

no
   

Total Seats: 273

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining.

    Random quote: "If you cannot convince a fascist, acquaint his head with the pavement." - Leon Trotsky

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 80