We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: On renewable energies
Details
Submitted by[?]: Revolutionary Worker's Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3091
Description[?]:
| It is our duty to research a generate energy through renewable sources. The Republic of Aloria needs to do it's part to preserve the environment, not to mention that renewable energies are usually less expensive also. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Renewable energy sources (eg. solar power, wind power).
Old value:: The government does not take any position with regards to renewable energy.
Current: The government does not take any position with regards to renewable energy.
Proposed: Government subsidies are provided for research and generation of energy through renewable sources.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:52:42, March 14, 2011 CET | From | Christian Democratic Party | To | Debating the On renewable energies |
| Message | We can see the merits of such funding and shall support this bill. |
| Date | 06:44:40, March 15, 2011 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the On renewable energies |
| Message | Actually no, I disagree. We have an abundance of coal and gas which we need to use up before we start thinking about renewable energy. No, renewable energy is actually more expensive. For example it costs next to nothing just to burn coal to create power and electricity, However, the cost is way more for say, a wind farm as the expense to put them up and to generate the power on a good windy day. I'm voting no, |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 376 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 186 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 188 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Conservatism, however, is too often a welcome excuse for lazy minds, loath to adapt themselves to fast changing conditions." - Sigmund Freud |