We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of November 3092
Details
Submitted by[?]: Luthorian Conservative Party 🔵
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 3093
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Liberal Alliance
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Imperial Aristocratic League
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Liberal Alliance
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Imperial Aristocratic League
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Liberal Alliance
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Liberal Alliance
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Constitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Luthorian Conservative Party 🔵
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Constitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Imperial Aristocratic League
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the 
Luthorian Democrats
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Liberal Alliance
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Luthorian Democrats
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:39:59, March 20, 2011 CET | From | Luthorian Democrats | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3092 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, Why did the LIP propose this when they know that the establishment parties are unwilling to accept change in government during the life of this Holy Imperial Diet? I yield. |
| Date | 13:46:46, March 20, 2011 CET | From | Constitutionalist Imperial League (IA) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3092 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, The CIL is perfectly eager and willing to work with the LIP as a coalition partner and possibly the CVP as well. Web believe that before a government is voted upon, negotiations between the current coalition partners and the LIP are in order, as to determine which cabinet positions each party will have. For instance, the CIL has no interest in the ministry of internal affairs but desires to keep the ministry of foreign affairs. That being said, we appreciate the LIP's sentiment of collaboration and look forward to further discussions and coalitions. His Imperial Highness, Prince Klemens of Geharon, Chairman of the Constitutionalist Imperial League and His Imperial Highness, Prince Siegmund of Orange, heir apparent to the throne of the Holy Luthori Empire are both quite displeased with the Luthorian People's Party because of their lack of respect and deference towards the Imperial government and the institutions of the realm. Of the new parties, it alone has virulently attacked and slandered the government and for these reasons the CIL will not be participating in a government with the People's Party until there is a discernible shift in attitude. Furthermore, no member of the People's Party shall be considered for membership in the Privy Council as long as this shift has not occurred I yield. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 9 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 154 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 38 |
| Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law. |
| Random quote: "This administration is not sympathetic to corporations; it is indentured to corporations." - Ralph Nader |