Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5461
Next month in: 01:08:53
Server time: 02:51:06, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Sanctity of Marriage Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Pontesian National Conservative Alliance

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 3102

Description[?]:

It is the opinion of the PNCA that the Pontesian government takes a recklessly apathetic position as to marriage. This bill seeks to reduce the number of capricious divorces by requiring grounded cause, recognize only those foreign marriages that adhere to Pontesian standards, and criminalize polygamy.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:23:27, April 06, 2011 CET
FromPontesian Royalist Party
ToDebating the Sanctity of Marriage Act
MessageThe PRP supports Articles 1 and 2 on religious grounds. Article 3 is highly questionable, we do not understand the purpose in creating victimless crimes. The crimes committed by the stereotypical polygamist are not matters of polygamy.

Date22:16:04, April 06, 2011 CET
FromPontesian National Conservative Alliance
ToDebating the Sanctity of Marriage Act
MessageThe PNCA strongly believes that marriage is a union between one man and one woman. We believe that polygamy is a sin and a slight against the moral values upon which our nation was founded.

Date22:19:19, April 06, 2011 CET
FromPontesian Royalist Party
ToDebating the Sanctity of Marriage Act
MessageThe PRP recalls many instances of polygamy in the Torah and is of the opinion that polygamy has it's valid uses. Polygamy should perhaps not be encouraged but it should not be illegal.

Date22:43:38, April 06, 2011 CET
FromPontesian National Conservative Alliance
ToDebating the Sanctity of Marriage Act
MessageVery well, then in the interests of passing Articles 1 and 2, we are prepared to drop Article 3 and submit this for a vote.

Date22:44:48, April 06, 2011 CET
FromPontesian Royalist Party
ToDebating the Sanctity of Marriage Act
MessageThe PRP supports this bill now.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 750

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Particracy does not allow role-play that seems to belong to the world of fantasy, science fiction and futuristic speculation.

    Random quote: "Erotic politicians, that's what we are. We're interested in anything about revolt, disorder, chaos and activity that appears to have no meaning." Jim Morrison

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 56