We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Income tax proposal of November 2142
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes to change income taxes. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2143
Description[?]:
| The Legitimate Businessman's Social Club propose to adjust the government's income tax policy to better address the economic situation of the Most Serene Republic of Darnussia. |
Proposals
Article 1
We propose to alter income tax brackets to the following setup. Information about the current income tax system can be found here.
| Bracket | Tax | Estimated Revenue |
| > 500 DAR | 5% | 2,882,000,000 DAR |
| > 1,500 DAR | 10% | 11,530,000,000 DAR |
| > 3,500 DAR | 15% | 34,589,000,000 DAR |
| > 7,500 DAR | 20% | 86,473,000,000 DAR |
| > 15,000 DAR | 25% | 173,258,000,000 DAR |
| > 30,000 DAR | 30% | 268,725,000,000 DAR | Total | 577,457,000,000 DAR |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:40:13, November 19, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of November 2142 |
| Message | Can we trust you on taxes? Your wrecked the ecomony before! THAT IS WHY CED IS IN CHARGE OF THIS AND NOT YOU! STOP CHEATING AND EXPOLITING BUGS! |
| Date | 02:40:49, November 19, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of November 2142 |
| Message | Fixed taxation. Now the higher up the ladder a class is, the more they pay, instead of CED's plan which was having the middle-bracket pay the most. It was quite odd. |
| Date | 02:41:44, November 19, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of November 2142 |
| Message | CED is in charge of this because he screwed us over for his own interests rather than the economic's left's interests. He has none of your interests on his mind. Of course, who'd admit that anyway? |
| Date | 02:45:52, November 19, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of November 2142 |
| Message | He is a Centralist, like myself and NLA and CoL. And your a CHEAT! |
| Date | 10:08:47, November 19, 2005 CET | From | Chinkopodian Economic Democrats | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of November 2142 |
| Message | "Fixed taxation. Now the higher up the ladder a class is, the more they pay, instead of CED's plan which was having the middle-bracket pay the most. It was quite odd." Errrrrm......wtf? "CED is in charge of this because he screwed us over for his own interests rather than the economic's left's interests. He has none of your interests on his mind. Of course, who'd admit that anyway?" I'll tell you whose interests I have in mind - that of both the people and the economy. The economy you claim you work towards, but your obsessive unregulation will hit a fault somewhere. SDP is doing International Politics and the Third World at uni, he understands this sort damage and how it has affected Africa. Unfortunately the world is not pretty and happy, I draw your attention to the private schools in Britain that illegally schemed together to raise all their fees going on the basis of others. And as for the people, that means they could quite easily get screwed over by such policies should they hit a weak spot (and yours did, landing ourselves with a 66bn DAR deficit). Private Establishments - yaay. Unregulation - nay. I was with you for a bit, but then I saw how you obsessively unregulated establishments and also destroyed state amenities in education on healthcare in some of your proposals. That's not good, and it really does oppress the poor as the left so often scream out. So I became a spy for them, before turning after the next elections (with a slight seat boost, so thanks :P) If I had my own interests in mind, I would become an utter populist. It's an easy way to gain seats for a bit. Then I would set up a rigid populist policy and stay there. But I don't, because that would be no fun for anyone else. And, for the record, I'm centre-right. Ha. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 81 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 79 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 41 |
| Random fact: Particracy isn't just a game, it also has a forum, where players meet up to discuss role-playing, talk about in-game stuff, run their own newspaper or organisation and even discuss non-game and real-life issues! Check it out: http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "The evil of the world is made possible by nothing but the sanction you give it." - Ayn Rand |