We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights, Second Attempt
Details
Submitted by[?]: Communist Party of Kafuristan
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2143
Description[?]:
This bill asks for the ratification of the <a href="viewtreaty.php?treatyid=110">Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights</a>. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:44:20, November 20, 2005 CET | From | Communist Party of Kafuristan | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights, Second Attempt |
Message | The Economic Party hates women! |
Date | 07:21:40, November 20, 2005 CET | From | Grand National Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights, Second Attempt |
Message | Ratifying this would place women on a higher level than men. Its creating special treatment. Equality is already there and this treaty is very pointless. |
Date | 11:17:24, November 20, 2005 CET | From | Communist Party of Kafuristan | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights, Second Attempt |
Message | There currently is no possibility to discriminate against men, yet there does remain the possibility to discriminate against women. It is only fair to guarantee there being no discrimination through the passing of such treaty. It is taking special caution for protecting the political minority. |
Date | 12:42:44, November 20, 2005 CET | From | The Raging Bull Zealots of Zidine | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights, Second Attempt |
Message | Pre-school? How is that womens right, except in the tinyest possible way. |
Date | 18:16:35, November 20, 2005 CET | From | Communist Party of Kafuristan | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights, Second Attempt |
Message | The ability to not be laden with a child for all day long by use of a preschool centre. My mother left me at preschool, and she got a job instead of staying at home thanks to the new freedom of it. There are many other similar examples of such working mothers who cannot afford to hire someone to watch their children while they themselves make a wage. |
Date | 20:17:05, November 20, 2005 CET | From | Grand National Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights, Second Attempt |
Message | Either way, this puts women at a higher level than men, and transexuals. I urge everyone to change their vote. |
Date | 22:16:55, November 20, 2005 CET | From | Communist Party of Kafuristan | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights, Second Attempt |
Message | Loons, you lack mental capacity, and it shows. It would require a two-thirds vote. Which would be two-hundred. And it doesn't. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 178 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 122 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: You can view who's online (i.e. been active the last 10 minutes) at the bottom of the menu (either at the top or the side). |
Random quote: "We pursue no other aim than freedom from oppression, liberty from lies, salvation from irrationality!" - Julius Callus, former Davostani politician |