Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5471
Next month in: 03:48:44
Server time: 12:11:15, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): AethanKal | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights, Second Attempt

Details

Submitted by[?]: Communist Party of Kafuristan

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2143

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the <a href="viewtreaty.php?treatyid=110">Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights</a>. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:44:20, November 20, 2005 CET
FromCommunist Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights, Second Attempt
MessageThe Economic Party hates women!

Date07:21:40, November 20, 2005 CET
From Grand National Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights, Second Attempt
MessageRatifying this would place women on a higher level than men. Its creating special treatment. Equality is already there and this treaty is very pointless.

Date11:17:24, November 20, 2005 CET
FromCommunist Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights, Second Attempt
MessageThere currently is no possibility to discriminate against men, yet there does remain the possibility to discriminate against women.

It is only fair to guarantee there being no discrimination through the passing of such treaty. It is taking special caution for protecting the political minority.

Date12:42:44, November 20, 2005 CET
FromThe Raging Bull Zealots of Zidine
ToDebating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights, Second Attempt
MessagePre-school? How is that womens right, except in the tinyest possible way.

Date18:16:35, November 20, 2005 CET
FromCommunist Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights, Second Attempt
MessageThe ability to not be laden with a child for all day long by use of a preschool centre.

My mother left me at preschool, and she got a job instead of staying at home thanks to the new freedom of it.
There are many other similar examples of such working mothers who cannot afford to hire someone to watch their children while they themselves make a wage.

Date20:17:05, November 20, 2005 CET
From Grand National Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights, Second Attempt
MessageEither way, this puts women at a higher level than men, and transexuals.

I urge everyone to change their vote.


Date22:16:55, November 20, 2005 CET
FromCommunist Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights, Second Attempt
MessageLoons, you lack mental capacity, and it shows.

It would require a two-thirds vote. Which would be two-hundred. And it doesn't.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 178

no
   

Total Seats: 122

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: You can view who's online (i.e. been active the last 10 minutes) at the bottom of the menu (either at the top or the side).

    Random quote: "We pursue no other aim than freedom from oppression, liberty from lies, salvation from irrationality!" - Julius Callus, former Davostani politician

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 53