We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Economical Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Movement for Revolution
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3119
Description[?]:
It is in the Liberal Movement's belief that an economical reform is required, a move towards a liberal economy. We believe the tax rate of corporations must be lowered to allow them the ability of providing high quality goods for low prices to our people. While the tax reform a) may not be enough for the desired goal or b) too much for our economy to handle; a) When the success of the reform is proven, an even lower tax rate will be achieved. b) We believe our people can afford paying for their own telephone lines, at least in majority, and thus we can support the economy by taking away the free telephone services. We will be open to discuss this bill. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Tax percentage of the profit made by corporations.
Old value:: 33
Current: 8
Proposed: 25
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The right to gamble.
Old value:: Only small-scale gambling is allowed, involving limited amounts of money; casinos are illegal.
Current: Gambling is illegal.
Proposed: Gambling is legal, but only in private homes and casinos with special licences.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning phone services.
Old value:: Telephone lines are provided free of charge to all citizens.
Current: There are no regulations on phone service.
Proposed: The state subsidizes the phone service of low income families but does not regulate the rates providers can charge for phone service.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:47:03, May 09, 2011 CET | From | Avanti Istalia! | To | Debating the Economical Reform |
Message | We would vote in favour of Artt. 2 and 3; we cannot, however, support Article 1 as we are already running a staggering deficit at 800 billion LIS. We are in favour of moderate tax cuts, but we must first reduce national expenses dramatically before considering such moves. |
Date | 21:53:52, May 09, 2011 CET | From | Liberal Movement for Revolution | To | Debating the Economical Reform |
Message | While we share Avanti Istalia's concern for our economy, we believe tax cuts will allow us to move towards a smaller government, and thus spare us the deficit. We'd like it to be noted that this is the -first step- of economical reforms. Cuts in military are required too. While we get smaller, we can pay the expenses with loans. |
Date | 23:43:42, May 09, 2011 CET | From | Quanzar Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Economical Reform |
Message | We also can support Act 2 and 3. However agree with Avanti Istalia concerning tax cuts. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 4 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 71 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation. |
Random quote: "The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." - H. L. Mencken |