Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5461
Next month in: 01:28:44
Server time: 06:31:15, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Economical Reform - Take Two

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Movement for Revolution

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 3119

Description[?]:

A second attempt, more planned and wide, open to discussion.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:42:12, May 10, 2011 CET
FromAvanti Istalia!
ToDebating the Economical Reform - Take Two
MessageThis is not an economical reform, this is anarchy legalized. We will never support those abominations that are Artt. 4, 9, and 11.

Date00:09:12, May 11, 2011 CET
FromLiberal Movement for Revolution
ToDebating the Economical Reform - Take Two
MessageArtt. 11 (currently 7) is fine as it stands, but rest of the articles are reformed.

Date00:16:15, May 11, 2011 CET
FromAvanti Istalia!
ToDebating the Economical Reform - Take Two
MessageWe will swallow it as it stands, for the sake of our nation's prosperity.

Date00:23:03, May 11, 2011 CET
FromQuanzar Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Economical Reform - Take Two
MessageWe agree with the majority of this proposal. However we cannot agree with Article 9 & 10. Should these be removed from the proposal we would agree.

Date11:25:10, May 11, 2011 CET
FromLiberal Movement for Revolution
ToDebating the Economical Reform - Take Two
MessageQNP was supportive of Art. 9 in the previous bill, why opposing it now?

And we'd like to learn what is wrong with Art. 10. Our government will still allow poor children to go to pre-school, only we won't pay for rich families now.

Date18:08:15, May 11, 2011 CET
FromQuanzar Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Economical Reform - Take Two
MessageApologies we meant Art. 8 & 10.

By accepting Art. 8 we would drive up the expense of medical treatments. This would put massive strain on low income families seeking treatment. Despite the cost we should not cut back on healthcare when it is needed. Even at a subsidised level.

Art. 9 we remain supportive of.

We believe Art. 10 is essentially an attempt at segregation. We do not understand why middle/higher income families should pay for their children to attend pre-school education. Education should be free for all and encouraged. We thought the Liberal Movement would support this view.

Date19:01:46, May 11, 2011 CET
FromLiberal Movement for Revolution
ToDebating the Economical Reform - Take Two
MessageIf it is the wish of the Nationalist Party, we will remove those two articles from the existing bill and discuss them in their specific bills.

Date20:38:39, May 11, 2011 CET
FromQuanzar Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Economical Reform - Take Two
MessageWe are happy with this proposal and will fully support these changes. Our thanks are extended to the Liberal Movement for Revolution.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 9

no
  

Total Seats: 66

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363

Random quote: "A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic." - Josef Stalin

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 91