We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Service Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Imperial Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2144
Description[?]:
| The Progressive Imperial Party feels that our nation's youth could benefit immensely from a national military service program that would allow for increased military efficacy for our nation, as well as an improved sense of national unity and solidarity resulting from our youths working together in our armed forces. By improving our military in this manner, we can offer military and disaster relief to poorer nations in return for improved economic opportunities for our own people. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards giving aid to foreign countries.
Old value:: The government never offers international aid.
Current: The government gives high levels of aid to countries in need.
Proposed: The government supplies "tied" aid to poorer nations in return for trading rights.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change National service.
Old value:: There shall be no mandatory military or civilian national service.
Current: There shall be no mandatory military or civilian national service.
Proposed: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve a term in the military.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:01:05, November 20, 2005 CET | From | National Fascisti | To | Debating the National Service Bill |
| Message | We support. |
| Date | 16:14:03, November 20, 2005 CET | From | United Soviet Party | To | Debating the National Service Bill |
| Message | we concur |
| Date | 06:04:26, November 21, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the National Service Bill |
| Message | We agree with Article 1 but disagree with Article 2. |
| Date | 14:30:10, November 21, 2005 CET | From | Anarcho-Capitalist Front | To | Debating the National Service Bill |
| Message | It seems strange for a People's Progressive Party to believe that foreign aid should be contingent on trading rights. |
| Date | 15:00:05, November 21, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the National Service Bill |
| Message | Its better than no foriegn aid at all. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 259 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 182 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Real life-life nationalities, cultures or ethnicities should not be referenced in Particracy (eg. "German"). |
| Random quote: "Even when laws have been written down, they ought not always to remain unaltered." - Aristotle |