We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: No Curfews Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Labour Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 3124
Description[?]:
| Even in a state of emergency, why should we have to be locked up in our homes at a certain time? We are not babies and we can roam the streets at whatever time we want no matter the circumstances. Get rid of this stupid practice at once! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Curfew policy (curfew time to be determined in the bill description).
Old value:: The national government may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Current: Local governments may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Proposed: No curfew policies may be established.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:17:54, May 16, 2011 CET | From | New Aloria Party (NAP) | To | Debating the No Curfews Act |
| Message | We do not approve. |
| Date | 09:03:09, May 17, 2011 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the No Curfews Act |
| Message | And why's that, why can't people have the freedom to be out at night? Like you say, you say people shouldn't be "forced" to do anything, but what is happening here "force" Talk about double standards and hypocrisy. |
| Date | 09:03:40, May 17, 2011 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the No Curfews Act |
| Message | And why's that, why can't people have the freedom to be out at night? Like you say, you say people shouldn't be "forced" to do anything, but what is happening here "force" Talk about double standards and hypocrisy. |
| Date | 09:04:12, May 17, 2011 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the No Curfews Act |
| Message | And why's that, why can't people have the freedom to be out at night? Like you say, you say people shouldn't be "forced" to do anything, but what is happening here "force" Talk about double standards and hypocrisy. |
| Date | 18:48:37, May 17, 2011 CET | From | Revolutionary Worker's Party | To | Debating the No Curfews Act |
| Message | We agree, the State must have no authority over the people. No one must be forced to be in their homes ''for their own safety''. It is only a method of quelling rebellions, and the will of the people must be respected. |
| Date | 22:20:29, May 17, 2011 CET | From | New Aloria Party (NAP) | To | Debating the No Curfews Act |
| Message | Becuase back during the NWO attacks on Aloria, we didn't enforce a curfew and kids were killed because they out late. |
| Date | 08:59:05, May 18, 2011 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the No Curfews Act |
| Message | Well that was ages ago, things have changed sir. If people want to roam the streets at night they can. You still haven't answered my question, you said you don't want to force anyone to do anything but yet this is forcing is it not? Don't avoid the question with me and don't give me a "Trust me, I'm from the government and I'm here to help you" response either. |
| Date | 21:56:04, May 19, 2011 CET | From | New Aloria Party (NAP) | To | Debating the No Curfews Act |
| Message | Whoa, your party does that you are the ones who have repeadtely voted for bigger government in matters of the private industry. This is keeping people safe, were not forcing them to go to war like you do. Were telling them in a state of emergency, heres a curfew you need to stay inside or your going to get in trouble by the police, were keeping you safe. |
| Date | 08:38:22, May 20, 2011 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the No Curfews Act |
| Message | Thats different, private industry has nothing to do with this. Yet again the facts mount up against you and all you do is block your ears and dig your head in the sand. I never forced anyone to go to war genius. i just want for all youths to serve a term in the military so that in times of war they have the experience to join up and fight. How is this keeping people safe? People can keep themselves safe and decide when its nighty night for them. You have said on repeated occasions "nobody should be forced to do anything " Seems like a case of do as i say not do as i do. This is just another classic case of big brother telling us that they're here to help, if we trust them everything will be fine. "We're keeping you safe." That is just coded language for "Hello, I am a faceless bureaucrat from the government. I am here to help and I always know whats best fro you. Now if you follow me on the yellow brick road, everything will be fine." Please PP, give us a break some of us can actually see through the dribble thats coming out of your slimy mouth. |
| Date | 03:37:51, May 21, 2011 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the No Curfews Act |
| Message | I see how it is, you've been torn to shreds so you just ignore this. |
| Date | 09:14:19, May 21, 2011 CET | From | New Aloria Party (NAP) | To | Debating the No Curfews Act |
| Message | Believe what you want. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 163 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 478 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, it is the responsibility of players to ensure the candidate boxes on their Party Overview screens are filled in with appropriate names. If a player is allotted seats in a Cabinet bill and has not filled in names for the relevant candidate position, then the program will automatically fill in the positions with names which might not necessarily be appropriate for the Cultural Protocols. |
| Random quote: "No man can outrun a bullet." - Idi Amin |