Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 01:18:09
Server time: 14:41:50, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): itsjustgav | johndoe1322 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of April 3136

Details

Submitted by[?]: Party for Aldegar

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 3136

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:02:13, June 14, 2011 CET
FromPeople's Party - Republican Democrats
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 3136
MessageWe have no intention of forming a cabinet with a party that is promoting weapons of mass destruction.

Date16:02:53, June 14, 2011 CET
FromParty for Aldegar
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 3136
MessageOkay.

Date16:03:17, June 14, 2011 CET
FromParty for Aldegar
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 3136
MessageThen, we have no intention with working with a party that puts national defence at risk.

Date12:59:25, June 15, 2011 CET
FromPeople's Party - Republican Democrats
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 3136
MessageWeapons of mass destruction are completely unsuitable for defensive purposes, therefore the defence of our country is not put at risk by renouncing them.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 93

no
  

Total Seats: 106

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

    Random quote: "Capitalism demands the best of every man- his rationality- and rewards him accordingly. It leaves every man free to choose the work he likes, to specialize in it, to trade his product for the products of others, and to go as far on the road of achievement as his ability and ambition will carry him." - Ayn Rand

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 45