We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Local Cultural Heritage Preservation Act of 3144
Details
Submitted by[?]: Genuine Progress Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 3144
Description[?]:
| This bill aims to let the local governments be involved with the preservation of cultural and historical sites and monuments. By leaving the matter to local governments, protection and promotion of the sites can be performed more efficiently since they have a better understanding of the story behind the cultural and historical sites. The government should play a role in the promotion of our culture and our history, and by doing so we help build the minds of young Alorians and inform others of the history of the great nation. By being more informed of one's history, we become more knowledgeable about its mistakes and triumphs and apply it in present time to lead this country to the right direction. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National, cultural and historic sites and monuments.
Old value:: The state actively protects scenery, localities, cultural, and historical sites; it maintains an agency to preserve them untouched if public interest so requires.
Current: The state actively protects scenery, localities, cultural, and historical sites; it maintains an agency to preserve them untouched if public interest so requires.
Proposed: This matter is left up to the local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:26:19, July 01, 2011 CET | From | Unified Scientists Party | To | Debating the Local Cultural Heritage Preservation Act of 3144 |
| Message | 100% Disagree with this. Maintaining Aloria's rich natural beauty from our own industrialization is a prime concern for the government. We hod the key to keep the nation's treasures untouched. |
| Date | 19:33:33, July 01, 2011 CET | From | Genuine Progress Alliance | To | Debating the Local Cultural Heritage Preservation Act of 3144 |
| Message | We understand that the government has a responsibility for this, USP. Our point, however, is that the local governments should be the one responsible for it because it is their heritage. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 184 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 369 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 197 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
| Random quote: "Politics is the art of postponing decisions until they are no longer relevant." - Henri Queuille |