Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 03:33:07
Server time: 20:26:52, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): Archangel_1 | FireboyUK | Liu Che | reformist2024 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Animal Registration Act of 3154

Details

Submitted by[?]: Hutorian Conservative Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 3154

Description[?]:

Bill to end the practice of registrating animals.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:00:57, July 20, 2011 CET
From Hutorian Conservative Party
ToDebating the Animal Registration Act of 3154
MessageRt Hon Duke Townsend MP, Leader of the Opposition,

Mr Speaker, i believe the status quo is quite unreasonable and an invasion of the state into peoples homes. I must make it clear however that i am not saying the Lib Dems are invading the private lives of our citizens and i am unsure as to who introduced the status quo but i believe it is time for a change in this law.

Mr Speaker, i believe the state should not be interfering in areas that do not concern it. Quite clearly the state has no business in knowing if people have pets or not. The database that keeps a list is a clear waste of money that could be used by local governments to maintain libraries, museums etc. and i believe that money would be far better off invested in things people use in their local area. Mr Speaker, the status quo needs to change and i hope all parties in the House will stand for basic privacy for Hutorian citizens and their right for the state not to invade their homes through bureaucracy like this.

Date00:11:10, July 21, 2011 CET
From Progressive Conservative Party
ToDebating the Animal Registration Act of 3154
MessageHon Winston Hadley, Leader of PCP

Mr Speaker, Our animals need to be protected and the only way that state can do it it's through the register, i don't get why HCP is against this law, there isn't any political problem to protect the animals, we ask HCP to retire this bill.

Date00:14:35, July 21, 2011 CET
From Liberal Democrats
ToDebating the Animal Registration Act of 3154
MessageRt Hon Hector James MP, Prime Minister,

Mr Speaker, whilst I see merit in what the Leader of the Opposition has proposed, I must vote against this. The reason we have registration of animals is so that we are able to return them to their owners if lost. Also, we must consider that local governments have the right to check up on the conditions these animals are kept in, and they also keep an eye on dangerous animals.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 113

no
   

Total Seats: 241

abstain
  

Total Seats: 37


Random fact: Players are expected to play the game independently and should not share their passwords or allow others to access their accounts.

Random quote: "It is obvious that the laissez-faire ideology represents the interests of big business. For decades, the right-wing has opposed welfare programs and nationalised companies, in favour of big business disguised under 'economic liberty'." - Cecilia Xu, former Gaduri politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 54