We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Public Transport Act of 3168
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3169
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Funding of public transport (where applicable).
Old value:: Local governments decide upon the funding policy.
Current: Public transport is fully subsidised by the government.
Proposed: Public transport is fully user-pays.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:32:36, August 18, 2011 CET | From | Noblest Party | To | Debating the Public Transport Act of 3168 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker I am inclined to half agree with this proposal. I feel that while there are a great deal of people in our nation that should pay for their own public transit, there is also a great deal of people in the nation that may need a small amount of assistance in paying for their travel. To counter this I propose we assist the few that need it while letting the others pay for it. Richard Wilcox RNP Chairman |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 273 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 326 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election. |
| Random quote: "Hence it comes about that all armed Prophets have been victorious, and all unarmed Prophets have been destroyed." - Niccolo Machiavelli |