Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5474
Next month in: 03:20:51
Server time: 04:39:08, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): dnobb | itsjustgav | MyungJak | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: SLP 18

Details

Submitted by[?]: Sociaal-Liberale Partij

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 3176

Description[?]:

To modernize intellectual property law

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date08:41:47, September 01, 2011 CET
FromPartij voor de Bevrijding van het Volk
ToDebating the SLP 18
MessageThis bill puts two opposite proposals on two different aspects of intellectual property in one single bill. The PBV would much prefer it if in the future in cases like this, two separate bills are proposed.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 301

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain

      Total Seats: 0


      Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there.

      Random quote: "The proletarians of the world have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Workers of all countries: unite!" - Karl Marx

      This page was generated with PHP
      Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
      Queries performed: 47