Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5474
Next month in: 01:39:06
Server time: 18:20:53, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AethanKal | BNairn2005 | Vesica5 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Federal Tax Reform

Details

Submitted by[?]: United National Front

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 3177

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:16:32, September 03, 2011 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Federal Tax Reform
Message"The Unionists shall not support any of these measures."

Michael Bryan,
Secretary of State for Finance

Date01:16:46, September 03, 2011 CET
FromUnited Liberal Caucus
ToDebating the Federal Tax Reform
MessageThe Liberals United for Change support these measures

Mika Murran
Chancellor of the Liberals United for Change

Date05:28:40, September 03, 2011 CET
FromFederal Republic Progressionist Party
ToDebating the Federal Tax Reform
MessageThese are reasonable changes.

Date22:17:26, September 03, 2011 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Federal Tax Reform
Message"For the borgeoise FRRP, it may be reasonable to tax basic food provision, but the Unionists know that the working Solentian does not want these changes."

Michael Bryan,
Former Finance Secretary

Date00:45:15, September 04, 2011 CET
FromFederal Republic Progressionist Party
ToDebating the Federal Tax Reform
MessageA 1% tax is hardly a tax at all.

Date01:40:35, September 04, 2011 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Federal Tax Reform
Message"To the rich, perhaps."

Michael Bryan,
Former Finance Secretary

Date03:59:53, September 04, 2011 CET
FromFederal Republic Progressionist Party
ToDebating the Federal Tax Reform
MessageAnd everyone else. Why won't the Unionist be willing to vote for a bill if it raises taxes on non-luxury by only 1%. The middle class could easily pay that and the lower class probaly could as well.

Date11:00:51, September 04, 2011 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Federal Tax Reform
Message"This only proved just how out of touch the FRRP is. The solution to Government spending more is not to take more of the people's money but to cut what it is spending. We have a LOWER population in this nation, not a higher one! Why on earth would we need to tax them more if they need much less services?"

Michael Bryan,
Former Finance Secretary.

Date16:21:48, September 04, 2011 CET
FromFederal Republic Progressionist Party
ToDebating the Federal Tax Reform
MessageTaxation can get you out of debt, it will increase the national revenue. Increase taxes or cut spending those are your only two options. You won't vote to increase taxes and won't vote to cut spending, you have to try to get out of debt, not just wallow in it.
-Sam Kennedy, FRPP financial advisor.

Date17:06:39, September 04, 2011 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Federal Tax Reform
Message"The Unionists have had a defecit reduction in place for years! Tax cuts in the right areas, no changes to tax and investment in health & education. These have all been made clear time after time for the last 50 years! These Progressionist lies need to stop!"

Muchaen Bryan,
Former Finance Secretary

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 179

no
   

Total Seats: 246

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Never use the same password as a friend. If two or more active accounts use the same password, they will be inactivated.

Random quote: "It makes no difference, in principle, if this 'collective will' is divined by the edicts of a dictator or by majority vote, so long as the rights of the individual may still be sacrificed." - Robert Garmong

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62