We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Divorce changes of 3177, proposal 2.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federal Republic Progressionist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 3179
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The legality of divorces (if marriages are recognised).
Old value:: Divorces are prohibited.
Current: Divorces are only legal with grounded cause (such as adultery, or violence).
Proposed: Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:07:20, September 05, 2011 CET | From | United Liberal Caucus | To | Debating the Divorce changes of 3177, proposal 2. |
| Message | The LUC supports this bill. -Mika Murran Chancellor of the Liberals United for Change |
| Date | 21:29:50, September 05, 2011 CET | From | Democratic Catholic Party | To | Debating the Divorce changes of 3177, proposal 2. |
| Message | We prefer to limit the initiative of divorce to a grounded causes. |
| Date | 23:51:44, September 05, 2011 CET | From | Federal Republic Progressionist Party | To | Debating the Divorce changes of 3177, proposal 2. |
| Message | But why if 2 people don't want to be together than they should have to be together. They should be able to leave a marrige at any time for any reason. |
| Date | 12:35:33, September 06, 2011 CET | From | Democratic Catholic Party | To | Debating the Divorce changes of 3177, proposal 2. |
| Message | We think the state should do everything possible to ensure the unity and peace. So it would be better to assess the actual seriousness of the decision, to avoid successive changes of mind and therefore high costs on our citizens. |
| Date | 23:31:48, September 06, 2011 CET | From | Federal Republic Progressionist Party | To | Debating the Divorce changes of 3177, proposal 2. |
| Message | People who are stuck together that don't want to be together will only ensure unity through force. We aren't an opressive government but that is something an opressive government would do. |
| Date | 12:41:08, September 07, 2011 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the Divorce changes of 3177, proposal 2. |
| Message | "The Unionists shall support this Act, with reluctance." Tamasa Bhatti, Unionist Senatorial Lead. |
| Date | 19:45:16, September 07, 2011 CET | From | Democratic Catholic Party | To | Debating the Divorce changes of 3177, proposal 2. |
| Message | We prefer to abstain in the vote. We believe that divorce should be granted only with a grounded causes. |
| Date | 16:03:06, September 08, 2011 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the Divorce changes of 3177, proposal 2. |
| Message | "So they claim that a Government needs to vote together...and then don't. Hypocracy yet again." Tamasa Bhatti, Unionist Senatorial Lead. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 264 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 122 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 39 |
| Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated. |
| Random quote: "You can't get rid of poverty by giving people money." - P. J. O'Rourke |