We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Civil liberties reform.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federal Republic Progressionist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3181
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on sexual relations.
Old value:: Sexual relation laws are set by local governments.
Current: Heterosexual relationships only are legal for consenting adults.
Proposed: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:37:29, September 10, 2011 CET | From |  Chann National Party (CNP) | To | Debating the Civil liberties reform. |
| Message | Yea. |
| Date | 06:59:43, September 10, 2011 CET | From | United Liberal Caucus | To | Debating the Civil liberties reform. |
| Message | The LUC supports article 2 VERY strongly. |
| Date | 14:24:13, September 10, 2011 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the Civil liberties reform. |
| Message | "We request these two articles be voted on seperately. We would support Article 1 but not Article 2." Tamasa Bhatti, Unionist Senatorial Leader. |
| Date | 20:50:44, September 10, 2011 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the Civil liberties reform. |
| Message | "Thank you. The Unionists unfortunately cannot support this change in the law." Tamasa Bhatti, Unionist Senatorial Lead. |
| Date | 22:58:50, September 10, 2011 CET | From | Democratic Catholic Party | To | Debating the Civil liberties reform. |
| Message | We can not support this. For us, sexual relations are legal only for procreation. We invite you to review the proposal. Se. Montgomery - SPP |
| Date | 02:28:28, September 11, 2011 CET | From | Federal Republic Progressionist Party | To | Debating the Civil liberties reform. |
| Message | We will try to reach a compromise. |
| Date | 02:55:18, September 11, 2011 CET | From | Federal Republic Progressionist Party | To | Debating the Civil liberties reform. |
| Message | This proposal is the best we can do to compromise. |
| Date | 03:59:28, September 11, 2011 CET | From | United Liberal Caucus | To | Debating the Civil liberties reform. |
| Message | Why would you only legalize sexual relations just for procreation? -Sayu Niita Solentian Health Minister |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 176 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 210 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 39 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves." - Abraham Lincoln |