We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Tax Reform 3183
Details
Submitted by[?]: United National Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3183
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Tax percentage of the profit made by corporations.
Old value:: 30
Current: 0
Proposed: 22
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Sales tax on luxury goods.
Old value:: 22
Current: 0
Proposed: 15
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 12:00:46, September 16, 2011 CET | From | Democratic Catholic Party | To | Debating the Tax Reform 3183 |
Message | "This proposal is serious and responsible. We thank the UNF, we support this with great joy" Demetreo Nerx Senete Warden & Leader of SPP |
Date | 15:57:29, September 16, 2011 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Tax Reform 3183 |
Message | And how is this to be paid for? The consequences of reckless fiscal policy must be addressed. Ryan Schroeder Leader, Labour Party |
Date | 22:29:45, September 16, 2011 CET | From | United Liberal Caucus | To | Debating the Tax Reform 3183 |
Message | When just a few years ago we had a huge defict this is not the time. -Grace S. Lough Speaker of the United Liberal Caucus |
Date | 03:35:39, September 17, 2011 CET | From | Federal Republic Progressionist Party | To | Debating the Tax Reform 3183 |
Message | We are voting yes but to keep us out of debt the PSCP has made an income tax proposal. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 213 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 22 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 168 |
Random fact: The use of proxy servers makes it impossible to detect multiing and is therefore forbidden. Players who access Particracy through a proxy will have their accounts inactivated. |
Random quote: "In public policy, it matters less who has the best arguments and more who gets heard, and by whom." - Ralph Reed |