Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5461
Next month in: 02:18:22
Server time: 05:41:37, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): hexaus18 | hexaus19 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Freedom to Marry Act of 3184

Details

Submitted by[?]: Chann National Party (CNP)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 3185

Description[?]:

An act to reform the governments stance toward marriage.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:29:48, September 19, 2011 CET
From Democratic Catholic Party
ToDebating the Freedom to Marry Act of 3184
Message"Another proof that the Cabinet proposed by Labour is unsustainable"

Demetreo Nerx
Senate Warden & Leader of the SPP

Date21:33:40, September 19, 2011 CET
From Chann National Party (CNP)
ToDebating the Freedom to Marry Act of 3184
MessageHow is this proof that the cabinet proposal by the Labour party is unsustainable? This is no proof at all. This is a legislative action on behalf of the Moderate Liberal Caucus, not of the Labour Party.

This is a policy that the MLC believes in and will continue to support, regardless of whether any other party supports it or not because Civil Liberties are not up for referendum and for are definitely not for the Government to infringe upon.

Stop throwing random phrases around that do not relate to the issue. Stop the rhetoric and actually say something that shows that you atleast make attempts at making sense.

Date22:24:11, September 19, 2011 CET
From United Liberal Caucus
ToDebating the Freedom to Marry Act of 3184
MessageThe United Liberal Caucus today, and in all of it's former versions have supported this. And will continue too.
-Grace S. Lough

Date02:08:48, September 20, 2011 CET
From Labour Party
ToDebating the Freedom to Marry Act of 3184
MessageSolentian law is the only law that I am interested in deferring to.

Date03:59:36, September 20, 2011 CET
From Federal Republic Progressionist Party
ToDebating the Freedom to Marry Act of 3184
MessageWhy are so many parties against equal rights? What is it that makes people disgusted by having peace?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 95

no
     

Total Seats: 330

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism").

    Random quote: "A man who has no office to go to - I don't care who he is - is a trial of which you can have no conception." - George Bernard Shaw

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 66