We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Freedom to Marry Act of 3184
Details
Submitted by[?]: Chann National Party (CNP)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 3185
Description[?]:
An act to reform the governments stance toward marriage. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign marriages.
Old value:: Only foreign marriages that comply with domestic policy regarding marriage are recognised.
Current: Only foreign marriages that comply with domestic policy regarding marriage are recognised.
Proposed: All foreign marriages are recognised, regardless of domestic policy regarding marriage.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:29:48, September 19, 2011 CET | From | Democratic Catholic Party | To | Debating the Freedom to Marry Act of 3184 |
Message | "Another proof that the Cabinet proposed by Labour is unsustainable" Demetreo Nerx Senate Warden & Leader of the SPP |
Date | 21:33:40, September 19, 2011 CET | From | Chann National Party (CNP) | To | Debating the Freedom to Marry Act of 3184 |
Message | How is this proof that the cabinet proposal by the Labour party is unsustainable? This is no proof at all. This is a legislative action on behalf of the Moderate Liberal Caucus, not of the Labour Party. This is a policy that the MLC believes in and will continue to support, regardless of whether any other party supports it or not because Civil Liberties are not up for referendum and for are definitely not for the Government to infringe upon. Stop throwing random phrases around that do not relate to the issue. Stop the rhetoric and actually say something that shows that you atleast make attempts at making sense. |
Date | 22:24:11, September 19, 2011 CET | From | United Liberal Caucus | To | Debating the Freedom to Marry Act of 3184 |
Message | The United Liberal Caucus today, and in all of it's former versions have supported this. And will continue too. -Grace S. Lough |
Date | 02:08:48, September 20, 2011 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Freedom to Marry Act of 3184 |
Message | Solentian law is the only law that I am interested in deferring to. |
Date | 03:59:36, September 20, 2011 CET | From | Federal Republic Progressionist Party | To | Debating the Freedom to Marry Act of 3184 |
Message | Why are so many parties against equal rights? What is it that makes people disgusted by having peace? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 95 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 330 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism"). |
Random quote: "A man who has no office to go to - I don't care who he is - is a trial of which you can have no conception." - George Bernard Shaw |