Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5474
Next month in: 00:27:28
Server time: 15:32:31, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): burgerboys | lulus | Paulo Nogueira | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of October 3188

Details

Submitted by[?]: Chann National Party (CNP)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 3189

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:38:24, September 27, 2011 CET
FromChann National Party (CNP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3188
MessageI have proposed the cabinets proportionally to how how many seats a party has. FIP will get three. Unionist and ULC two. And the others one. Let us all work in a bipartisan fashion to get done what needs to be done.

Date20:30:19, September 27, 2011 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3188
MessageLabour will support a multipartisan coalition. This is an unexpected but welcome move by our friends in the Moderate caucus.

Labour Leader Ryan Schroeder

Date21:25:03, September 27, 2011 CET
FromChann National Party (CNP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3188
MessageThe Supreme President, Sotear Chann, recognizes the fact that each party represents different pockets of the population and therefore it is important that we have representatives of ALL the people on the cabinet, not just those of the left and those of the right.

Date04:12:00, September 28, 2011 CET
FromUnited National Front
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3188
MessageWe appreciate the effort taken by the Supreme President to propose a cabinet which includes all parties. We are happy with the ministry given to us.
However we don't approve his decision to allocate Defence, Finance & Foreign Affairs ministries to his own party in a situation where MLC is not the largest party.

Richard Smith
Leader of UNF.

Date04:54:57, September 28, 2011 CET
FromUnited Liberal Caucus
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3188
MessageThe United Front should approve this bill. In past cabinets the so-called People's Alliance as purposefully shut out of the ruling coalition for their extreme views. This is a great way to move past that phase in our nation's history by becoming mainstream parties. Working within a framework that should be accepted by all. And the allocation of the seats is fine. If anything the Progressives should get the seat currently being assigned to the SPP. They do after all have more seats.
-Grace S. Lough

Date05:00:55, September 28, 2011 CET
FromUnited National Front
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3188
MessageBut don't you think keeping the 3 main ministries with a party which doesn't have the largest share of the senate is questionable?

Date05:56:24, September 28, 2011 CET
FromFederal Independent Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3188
MessageWe outright refuse to be part of a cabinet that will be instrumental in dismantling Solentian heritage and tradition as we know it. The MLC has earned our opposition to its agenda and we will derail every attempt it makes to install change for the sake of change.

This unwarranted act of political war will not be left unanswered.

FIP Senator Mario LaHood

Date11:45:48, September 28, 2011 CET
FromDemocratic Catholic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3188
Message"These piles are unreasonable. The SPP now has nothing to do with the radical parties such as the ULC and the MLC or Labour. This is a disastrous Cabinet"

Kate House
Secretary of the SPP

Date16:35:58, September 28, 2011 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3188
MessageYou are the true radicals.

Date21:26:26, September 28, 2011 CET
FromChann National Party (CNP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3188
MessageThe only radicals I see are those who would oppose a cabinet that is inclusive of all parties... whereas the cabinets of the FIP and the UNF and SPP have been strictly partisan and in favor of parties who happen to hold their views while shutting out opposition.

True Democracy means Change, whether it be gradual or whether it be revolutionary. Remember that we also represent the views of the citizens who have elected us, in essence, not all citizens support your traditionalist and radical ultra-conservative views.

To demand that only your views are reasonable is to say to those citizens who do not agree are radical.

You have called those we represent radicals. The FIP has declared "political war" upon the citizens we represent... The FIP is responsible for this "political civil war", not the parties that happen to represent those who have a different view.


Date21:38:59, September 28, 2011 CET
FromChann National Party (CNP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3188
MessageUNITED NATIONAL FRONT: "However we don't approve his decision to allocate Defence, Finance & Foreign Affairs ministries to his own party in a situation where MLC is not the largest party."


Let me remind you of what FIP proposed in the Supreme Presidential Cabinet 3183 -3184 ( http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=327865 ) At that time the Moderate Liberal Caucus was the largest party, yet:

Proposals

Article 1

The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Unionist Party

Article 2

The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Solentian People's Party

Article 3

The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the United National Front

Article 4

The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the United National Front

Article 5

The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the United National Front

Article 6

The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Unionist Party

Article 7

The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Solentian People's Party

Article 8

The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Federal Independent Party

Article 9

The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Unionist Party

Article 10

The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Solentian People's Party

Article 11

The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Federal Independent Party

Article 12

The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Federal Independent Party

Article 13

The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Unionist Party

Date15:17:15, October 01, 2011 CET
FromUnited National Front
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3188
MessageTo: MLC.
you must also remember that we abstained from voting for that proposal.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 190

no
    

Total Seats: 210

abstain
 

Total Seats: 25


Random fact: Particracy is completely free! If you want to support the game financially, feel free to make a small donation to the lievenswouter@gmail.com Paypal account.

Random quote: "A son can bear with equanimity the loss of his father, but the loss of his inheritance may drive him to despair." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 78