Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5461
Next month in: 03:47:59
Server time: 08:12:00, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Dioskouros | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Value Added Tax (VAT)

Details

Submitted by[?]: British Protectorate Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 3195

Description[?]:

This is what we need to make our economy competitive again.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:36:14, October 08, 2011 CET
FromDemocratic Party
ToDebating the Value Added Tax (VAT)
MessageDisagree, Increase the Luxary tax but dont tax essential goods. Harder for the poor

Date04:37:13, October 08, 2011 CET
FromBritish Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Value Added Tax (VAT)
Message20% isn't that much. It all depends on the cost of what you're buying.

Plus, lower income people also buy luxury goods too.

Date04:38:32, October 08, 2011 CET
FromDemocratic Party
ToDebating the Value Added Tax (VAT)
MessageThen can you decrease it to maybe 10%? To see if it effects the people in took harsh a way

Date04:42:49, October 08, 2011 CET
FromBritish Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Value Added Tax (VAT)
MessageHow about 15%? Really, the VAT is only to tax goods and services. It's not a great big new tax like some think.

Date04:43:29, October 08, 2011 CET
FromDemocratic Party
ToDebating the Value Added Tax (VAT)
MessageAlright. 15 it is

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
 

Total Seats: 435

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." - Thomas Jefferson

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 48