Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5474
Next month in: 00:49:41
Server time: 07:10:18, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National Military and Civil Service Act.

Details

Submitted by[?]: Hosian-Konservative Allianz

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 3195

Description[?]:

The Communist Party of Dorvik has always believed that everyone should be employed, that everyone should somehow serve for the benefit of the people and the state.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:21:30, October 10, 2011 CET
FromRadikalen für Dorvik
ToDebating the National Military and Civil Service Act.
MessageThe KRP fails to see how this proposal is any different than that from our own party and therefore have enough reason to believe that this is just a way to catch the fame for our idea and proposal. Therefore we have to vote no, we can not support such lowly acts.

Date20:19:06, October 10, 2011 CET
FromSozialistische Weltrepublik Partei
ToDebating the National Military and Civil Service Act.
MessageThe KRP voting against a military bill! What a day it has become!

Date21:05:58, October 10, 2011 CET
FromRadikalen für Dorvik
ToDebating the National Military and Civil Service Act.
MessageBeing pro-military does not equal voting blindly on every proposal, mr. Raskop. Something your party has yet to realize.

Date21:16:28, October 10, 2011 CET
FromSozialistische Weltrepublik Partei
ToDebating the National Military and Civil Service Act.
MessageIs that why you have voted against an identical proposal to one you yourself proposed? At least be consistent.

Date22:38:08, October 10, 2011 CET
FromRadikalen für Dorvik
ToDebating the National Military and Civil Service Act.
MessageMr. Raskop, when the Kommuniste decided to simply take our act and paste their name on it we feel it is necessary to vote no. This is only a way of the Kommuniste to get more votes by claiming they come up with magnificent new proposals.

- Gebhard von Lettow, Defence specialist of the KRP

Date00:52:03, October 11, 2011 CET
FromSozialistische Weltrepublik Partei
ToDebating the National Military and Civil Service Act.
MessageIt's well within your right to put politics before military sense. If you wish to do so, then we will not stop you, nor will you stop us from voting against this bill, as we feel it would dilute the professional military we currently have.

-Ingo Sternberg, SWP Defense Chief

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 241

no
     

Total Seats: 259

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "Men who have greatness in them don't go in for politics." - Albert Camus

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 52