Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5461
Next month in: 00:58:19
Server time: 07:01:40, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Armed Forces of Dorvik Defense Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Hosian-Konservative Allianz

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 3200

Description[?]:

Upon review of the Armed Forces of Dorvik the First Secretary for Defense Radko Mihaylov stated that "Dorvik's military power has been limited by pacifist. We need to change that to establish our nations protection as our number one priority."

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:19:14, October 10, 2011 CET
From Radikalen für Dorvik
ToDebating the Armed Forces of Dorvik Defense Act
MessageMister speaker,
The Konservative Reichspartei is happy to see improvement on the Armed Forces but we believe this proposition will only make it worse. Let me take the liberty to explain why we disagree per article.

Article 1. We, the KRP, are of opinion that biological and chemical weapons are the worst weapons to use in a war. Their power in battles is terrifying but the chance of friendly fire and ruining entire areas, including it's nature, is too much. Also, these weapons do not have the same scare-rate as nuclear weapons. Therefore we disagree with article 1.

Article 2. As mentioned before, we find it unnecessary to use biological and chemical weapons.

Article 3. This is an outright breach on personal freedom and we fail to see how this improves the military in a single way. If one thing should be evaded in our military it should be homophobic soldiers. We have several homosexuals within our party, including veterans and find this proposal extremely offensive.

Article 4. Regarding the use of nuclear weapons, if anyone else dares to use it upon us we should deliver it back to them.

Article 5. Instead of chemical and biological weapons we do see reason to develop and construct nuclear weaponry. It fits our aim for Realpolitik, the mere presence of a nuclear bomb in one's arsenal scares off many potential enemies. In our opinion it has been proven plenty of times that nuclear weapons actually avoid wars and do not generate wars.

Article 6. We also disagree with article 6 because we see no need to care for another nation's cowards. Send them back to their own nation where they can live in disgrace and peace with their families. Our nation should supply food and healthcare to outsiders who are even at war with us.

As you can hear mr. Mihaylov, we greatly disagree with your proposal and only agree on two points. If you wish the see the support of the KRP, which we really want to give, you should remove the chemical and biological warfare parts, the offensive law to oppress homosexuality and the nonsense policy to imprison hostile cowards in our state.

Date20:21:12, October 10, 2011 CET
From Sozialistische Weltrepublik Partei
ToDebating the Armed Forces of Dorvik Defense Act
MessageWhile we certainly agree that the military is of vital importance to the state, we feel that certain articles, such as those pertaining to chemical weapons, and especially those regarding to homosexuality, infringe upon human and civil rights, and therefore we cannot accept this bill on the barest of our principles. We do however support our right to hold nuclear weapons as they are vital to the defense of a modern state.

Date03:19:26, October 11, 2011 CET
From Demokratische Partei
ToDebating the Armed Forces of Dorvik Defense Act
MessageMr Speaker,

We feel that as many of these proposals simply seek to undo many of the changes that we, the Demokratische Partei, have made it would be impossible to see how we would support this bill.

Date08:05:25, October 11, 2011 CET
From Vereinigte Bewegung der Regionen
ToDebating the Armed Forces of Dorvik Defense Act
MessageMr Speaker,

The SED is willing to support this bill only if art 3 is removed or proposed in another bill.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 249

no
  

Total Seats: 159

abstain
  

Total Seats: 92


Random fact: Hundreds of vessels were lost while traversing the cold waters of the Sea of Lost Souls. It is located between Seleya and Majatra.

Random quote: "One day our descendants will think it incredible that we paid so much attention to things like the amount of melanin in our skin or the shape of our eyes or our gender instead of the unique identities of each of us as complex human beings." - Franklin Thomas

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 80