We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Post Office Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2147
Description[?]:
| Let us impose standards that all post offices must meet to ensure that the people's private letters and packages are not violated. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the post office
Old value:: There is a nationalised post office. Private post office agencies are allowed to exist, and the services provided by them are not regulated.
Current: There is a nationalised post office agency. Private post offices are allowed to exist but the services provided by them are regulated.
Proposed: There is a nationalised post office agency. Private post offices are allowed to exist but the services provided by them are regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:38:17, November 26, 2005 CET | From | Militant Socialist Party | To | Debating the Post Office Act |
| Message | Agreed. |
| Date | 22:18:36, November 26, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Post Office Act |
| Message | nein - consumer choice is the only regulation they need. |
| Date | 03:34:14, November 27, 2005 CET | From | LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty | To | Debating the Post Office Act |
| Message | I vote YES! |
| Date | 01:16:41, November 28, 2005 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Post Office Act |
| Message | This allows govt. yahoo's to inspect private packages for hate speech and drugs and such! I strongly oppose! |
| Date | 03:17:31, November 28, 2005 CET | From | National Conservative Party | To | Debating the Post Office Act |
| Message | What's wrong with the punishment of hate speech? |
| Date | 12:26:06, November 28, 2005 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Post Office Act |
| Message | The definition of "hate speech" is arbitrary, allowing defacto censorship. Besides, havn't you heard the People speak? Practically all of our positions are "hate speech" to someone! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 157 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 243 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, it is the responsibility of players to ensure the candidate boxes on their Party Overview screens are filled in with appropriate names. If a player is allotted seats in a Cabinet bill and has not filled in names for the relevant candidate position, then the program will automatically fill in the positions with names which might not necessarily be appropriate for the Cultural Protocols. |
| Random quote: "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong." - Voltaire |