We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Civil Rights Act: November 2145
Details
Submitted by[?]: International Society of Bankers
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2147
Description[?]:
| Civil Rights Act: November 2145 |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning adoption.
Old value:: Adoption policy is to be established by local governments.
Current: Adoption is regulated by the government. Applicants can adopt after a routine check-up.
Proposed: Adoption is not regulated.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning phone services.
Old value:: Telephone lines are provided free of charge to all citizens.
Current: The state regulates the rates providers can charge for phone service.
Proposed: There are no regulations on phone service.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on population control.
Old value:: Population control is left to local governments.
Current: The government does not engage in population control.
Proposed: The government does not engage in population control.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of wild animals as pets.
Old value:: Wild animals may be kept as pets; the owners of dangerous wild animals must take the necessary measures to ensure they can't escape.
Current: The government maintains a list of dangerous wild animals which may not be kept as pets; other wild animals may be kept as pets.
Proposed: All wild animals may be kept as pets, without any restrictions or precautions whatsoever.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:41:08, November 25, 2005 CET | From | Lodamun Centre-Left Coalition | To | Debating the Civil Rights Act: November 2145 |
| Message | Support 1, 4, 5, 6 [adoption, phones, pop control, pets], split? |
| Date | 21:39:44, November 25, 2005 CET | From | CNT/AFL | To | Debating the Civil Rights Act: November 2145 |
| Message | Oppose all. |
| Date | 23:40:32, November 25, 2005 CET | From | Slaytanic Wehrmacht | To | Debating the Civil Rights Act: November 2145 |
| Message | support all except #2. please split? (wondering why you want to make fireworks illegal) |
| Date | 00:08:40, November 26, 2005 CET | From | Juche Front (The Resistance) | To | Debating the Civil Rights Act: November 2145 |
| Message | Juche will vote to ban fireworks. The rest is a shameful abandonment of government responsibilities during wartime. |
| Date | 10:06:56, November 27, 2005 CET | From | International Society of Bankers | To | Debating the Civil Rights Act: November 2145 |
| Message | I didnt mean to make fireworks illegal 0: |
| Date | 03:37:28, November 28, 2005 CET | From | MLTP (The Resistance) | To | Debating the Civil Rights Act: November 2145 |
| Message | We support number one, but that's it. So no. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 64 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 236 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election. |
| Random quote: "I am working for the time when unqualified blacks, browns, and women join the unqualified men in running our government." - Cissy Farenthold |