We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Income tax proposal of October 3213
Details
Submitted by[?]: Stanton House
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes to change income taxes. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3218
Description[?]:
| The tory ACN propose to adjust the government's income tax policy to better address the economic situation of the National State of Beluzia. |
Proposals
Article 1
We propose to alter income tax brackets to the following setup. Information about the current income tax system can be found here.
| Bracket | Tax | Estimated Revenue |
| > 10,000 BEL | 1% | 2,390,000,000 BEL |
| > 15,000 BEL | 10% | 26,528,000,000 BEL |
| > 25,000 BEL | 20% | 31,067,000,000 BEL |
| > 50,000 BEL | 50% | 5,898,000,000 BEL | Total | 65,883,000,000 BEL |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:58:49, November 16, 2011 CET | From | Stanton House | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of October 3213 |
| Message | this will get us 5 biltont more that the curarty bill and is more fair us |
| Date | 20:45:59, November 16, 2011 CET | From | Progressive Conservatives | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of October 3213 |
| Message | Our government disagrees. The equal tax plan we passed during the last session brought a flat 5% tax on people without regard for social class made Beluzia a fair, rich and soon-to-be prosperous country. 5 billion more isn't enough to return to discrimination. |
| Date | 21:48:03, November 16, 2011 CET | From | Stanton House | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of October 3213 |
| Message | why about the very poor pelpole in a counter have 1 tax barcker is not fair on them |
| Date | 23:26:37, November 16, 2011 CET | From | House Forstev (Liberal Republican Party) | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of October 3213 |
| Message | The PHP supports the notion of a flat tax, but only above a bracket yearly income bracket of 10,000 BEL. |
| Date | 08:37:54, November 17, 2011 CET | From | Progressive Conservatives | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of October 3213 |
| Message | Can you advise what kind of effect your 10,000 BEL bracket would have on revenue? |
| Date | 11:33:07, November 17, 2011 CET | From | Stanton House | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of October 3213 |
| Message | start at 10,000 bel will tack down uslere you put the tax barther up to 10% |
| Date | 11:35:46, November 17, 2011 CET | From | Stanton House | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of October 3213 |
| Message | look at this bill this the affer if you put up to 10,000bel but the tax barcke go to 10%http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=332208 |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |
| yes |
Total Seats: 193 | |
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |
| abstain | Total Seats: 109 |
| Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
| Random quote: "Nature provides a free lunch, but only if we control our appetites." - William Ruckelshaus |