Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5471
Next month in: 00:17:13
Server time: 11:42:46, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Electoraal system reform of 3217

Details

Submitted by[?]: Monarchic National Front

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 3218

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:17:27, November 23, 2011 CET
FromMonarchic National Front
ToDebating the Electoraal system reform of 3217
MessageWe are aware we proposed this reform years ago but now in Assembly there are new parties and a new President so we try to repropose it.
Our Republic has 2 provinces different from population.
- Vojnový Pokrik has 19,918,879 citizens
- Barovia has 7,880,793 citizens

With the actual electoral system Barovia province is absolutley non influential in the electoral contest since Vojnový Pokrik has the majority of seats (71.65%).
In addition with the increase of number of parliament seats Borovia risk to be underrepresented in the Chamber.
So with the aim to re-equilibrate the situation we propose to reform the electoral system to a pseudo proportional which give more representation to Borovia province.


Date17:43:47, November 23, 2011 CET
FromGréne Gebéorscipe Sylf Vorona
ToDebating the Electoraal system reform of 3217
MessageThis is illogical; it is unfair for Barovia to be given more seats than Vojnový Pokrik since then Vojnový Pokrik would be the ones underrepresented which defeats the purpose of this bill. The current system allows for seats to be drawn with population in a certain area being taken into account rather than equal seats or what you suggested which would mean that their would be no fair representation.

Date08:32:05, November 24, 2011 CET
FromLiberal Alliance
ToDebating the Electoraal system reform of 3217
MessageYes we fully agree with the Green Party. This is a stupid bill that will that will take away fair representation to the majority of people in this country. It is logical that the more people there are in a province, the more representation is needed.

Date15:43:17, November 24, 2011 CET
FromMonarchic National Front
ToDebating the Electoraal system reform of 3217
MessageDefining a proposal as stupid is very offensive and unmotivated. With this arrogant way to do politic you discredit all Assembly and all your voters.

Date08:44:57, November 25, 2011 CET
FromLiberal Alliance
ToDebating the Electoraal system reform of 3217
MessageTell it to somebody who cares!

Date11:17:33, November 25, 2011 CET
FromLiberal Alliance
ToDebating the Electoraal system reform of 3217
MessageActually, I apologise. Ignore my most recent comment. What does the GP and NDF think of giving fair representation to both provinces, regardless of population?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 214

no
  

Total Seats: 536

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

    Random quote: "Cruel leaders are replaced only to have new leaders turn cruel." - Ernesto "Che" Guevara

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 57