Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5471
Next month in: 00:15:11
Server time: 23:44:48, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): ameerali | Dx6743 | Freemarket21 | hexaus18 | libdem555 | TocouNeymarÉGol2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Kanjor Name Change Discussion

Details

Submitted by[?]: Party of Kanjor

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2174

Description[?]:

This bill, if voted through, will change the name of the country to the "Kanjor", as we are not actually an empire proper anymore. This is also provisional, and hopefully someone will suggest a better name. Just need to get rid of the Empire status.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:27:42, November 26, 2005 CET
From Kanjoran Socialist Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageNo, we are not a republic. That was done away with a while ago. We are now an empire. Since we support the empire, we will vote no.

Date15:33:44, November 26, 2005 CET
From Secular Humanist Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageI am a strong supporter of the republic and will vote almost anything different from this backward empire status.

Date15:38:05, November 26, 2005 CET
From Kanjoran State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageI strongly disagree with this.

Date16:30:31, November 26, 2005 CET
From Malfico Progressive Fascist Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageNo chance of us supporting it. We proposed the estates general and would like to keep it. Everybody has presidents and prime ministers. it is better to be different.

Date23:41:44, November 26, 2005 CET
From Kanjoran Socialist Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageIt is odd how you got voted in as emporor when you do not support the empire.

Date13:31:51, November 27, 2005 CET
From Kanjoran Democratic Alliance
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageWe agree with the MPFP.

Date16:14:09, November 27, 2005 CET
From Party of Kanjor
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageKDA, you're the Kanjoran "Democratic" Alliance, yet you support a non-democratic naming system?

Date23:27:28, November 27, 2005 CET
From Kanjoran Imperial Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageHow in the world is this "non-democratic?" I should remind the anti-empirists that the most powerfull organ, us, is elected directly by the people! For god's sake, we even got rid of the hereditary monarch and replaced him with a DEMOCRATICALLY elected HoS. Think about the claims you make before you say them.

Date15:07:40, November 28, 2005 CET
From Party of Kanjor
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageReads what I say properly before commenting on it. I said non-democratic naming system, not system.

Date02:08:17, November 30, 2005 CET
From Kanjoran Imperial Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageI despise all of you for doing this to me, but at least make the name exciting and unique.

Date10:37:08, November 30, 2005 CET
From Malfico Progressive Fascist Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageI should point out KIP, that it isnt only you who plays this game there are 11 other players here. Not all of them are petulant little kids when they dont get their way. In addition, if you dont like the direction go elsewhere. You up and leave and then expect us to all change back to what you want the moment your holiness deigns to return.

Date16:04:46, November 30, 2005 CET
From Kanjoran Imperial Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
Messagewhat? Is it so terrible to be angry?

Date13:06:09, December 03, 2005 CET
From Action Française
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageNa, just make sure you have a wife who likes to be punched

Date15:30:02, December 03, 2005 CET
From Yehudi Aliyah
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageHow about the Imperial Republic of Kanjor?
Too oxymoronic?

Date16:08:12, December 05, 2005 CET
From Kanjoran Imperial Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
Messagenot at all. An empire doesn't have to be despotic.

Date00:12:12, December 06, 2005 CET
From Yaskovoi Independent Communist Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageProlaterian state of Kanjor? no?..... didn't think so. Never mind.

Date00:24:31, December 06, 2005 CET
From Kanjoran Imperial Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageHow about the Grand Confederation of Kanjoran States, Imperial Coalition of Kanjoran Nations, Imperial Federation of Kanjoran States, Imperial Confederation of Kanjoran Republics, etc.; something along the lines of what Lodamun did (the Five Nations of Lodamun)
it will please all of the federalists among us...

Date01:18:26, December 06, 2005 CET
From Populist Liberal Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageI like "Imperial Republic of Kanjor," keeping ties with the recent past while affirming that we are currently a republic. Or the "United Commonwealths of Kanjor," as our regions are called Commonwealths.

Date11:25:38, December 07, 2005 CET
From Secular Humanist Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageUnited commonwealths is not bad

Date00:20:18, December 09, 2005 CET
From Yehudi Aliyah
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageSince we no longer have an emperor, here are some suggestions:

The Union of Kanjor
The Union of Kanjoran Commonwealths (too long)
The Kanjoran Confederation
The Kanjoran Eidgenossenschaft (Convenant Union)

or we could do like Canada and just have «Kanjor», that is neutral.

Date01:59:00, December 09, 2005 CET
From Yehudi Aliyah
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
Messageor the Communities of Kanjor

Date10:51:00, December 12, 2005 CET
From Malfico Progressive Fascist Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageAll of those are dire.

Date12:59:30, December 30, 2005 CET
From Secular Humanist Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageAs the political situation is not very stable, we should settle on a neutral name that goes well with many forms of government.
I think that "Kanjor" alone is the best, but Yehudi Aliyah's proposals are also good.

Date20:48:11, January 04, 2006 CET
From Secular Humanist Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessagePlease, everybody!
I propose

Kanjor (I'd prefer this one)
Kanjoran Commonwealths
Kanjoran Confederation
Kanjoran Union

Do you like these? just some of them? you want to veto one you really dislike? tell me.
Also tell me if there are other proposals.
Let's make this name-change in the next years.

Date10:48:16, January 05, 2006 CET
From Kanjoran Socialist Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageI would like Kanjor until we can come up with a good name.

Date11:02:19, January 05, 2006 CET
From Secular Humanist Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageWe shouldn't change the name of the nation often. It is not done by passing a bill, we must ask some admin to do it.
Let's choose a definitive name, not a temporary one.

Date18:41:47, January 05, 2006 CET
From Party of Kanjor
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageIt is done by passing a bill. You must pass a bill with a 2/3 majority then post on the forums about it to get it changed.

Date20:08:53, January 05, 2006 CET
From Action Française
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageVetoed

Date20:12:33, January 05, 2006 CET
From Secular Humanist Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageVetoed what name?

Date11:01:38, January 06, 2006 CET
From Action Française
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageAny name change, for now.

Date19:34:20, January 08, 2006 CET
From Secular Humanist Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageOk, in the meanwhile, let's keep discussing the name change for the future. The others want to keep this name or to change it?

Date21:30:27, January 17, 2006 CET
From Kanjoran Socialist Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageWat about the Kanjoran Alliance?

Date10:03:43, January 21, 2006 CET
From Party of Kanjor
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
MessageI think we should stick with Kanjor, not Kanjoran, as we were originally the Kanjor Republic, Kanjoran was only used in our country name when the empire was formed. We need to throw off all remnants of our empirical status.

Date14:29:26, January 21, 2006 CET
From Kanjoran Socialist Party
ToDebating the Kanjor Name Change Discussion
Messagealright, Kanjor is good for me

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 82

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
        

    Total Seats: 43


    Random fact: Players have a responsibility to make a reasonable effort to be accurate when communicating the rules to other players. Any player who manipulatively misleads another player about the rules will be subject to sanction.

    Random quote: "Without opposition there is no politics." - Alun Daffys, former Alorian politician

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 120