We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: SR 023: Family Defense Act 3218
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party of Solentia
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 3219
Description[?]:
~ |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning who can proceed with adoption; in case adoption is legal.
Old value:: Everyone may adopt children.
Current: Only heterosexual couples may adopt children.
Proposed: Only heterosexual couples may adopt children.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy toward marriage.
Old value:: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Current: The government only recognises civil marriages between a man and a woman.
Proposed: The government only recognises civil marriages between a man and a woman.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning parental qualifications.
Old value:: The government does not hold qualifications for new parents.
Current: The government does not hold qualifications for new parents.
Proposed: The government requires a test for would-be parents, if parents circumvent the test the government takes custody.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:15:32, November 25, 2011 CET | From | Federal Republic Progressionist Party | To | Debating the SR 023: Family Defense Act 3218 |
Message | No. Everyone is equal and only a fool would think differently. |
Date | 00:04:14, November 26, 2011 CET | From | Federal Republic Progressionist Party | To | Debating the SR 023: Family Defense Act 3218 |
Message | The ULC's bill actually prevents laws like this from passing. (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=328831) |
Date | 00:44:40, November 26, 2011 CET | From | United Liberal Caucus | To | Debating the SR 023: Family Defense Act 3218 |
Message | This hardly defends "the family" and I challenge the Conservative Party to state how this is helpful to our society. |
Date | 10:42:29, November 26, 2011 CET | From | Pink Party! | To | Debating the SR 023: Family Defense Act 3218 |
Message | The current laws defend 'the family', these proposals simply go against families and alienate minorities. |
Date | 12:01:44, November 26, 2011 CET | From | United National Front | To | Debating the SR 023: Family Defense Act 3218 |
Message | Although we strongly oppose article 3, we will vote for this bill. But in case if this bill gets passed we will introduce a new bill to repeal article 3. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 310 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 115 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with. |
Random quote: "It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required." - Winston Churchill |