Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5461
Next month in: 02:24:36
Server time: 09:35:23, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): aai14 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: SR 023: Family Defense Act 3218

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party of Solentia

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 3219

Description[?]:

~

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:15:32, November 25, 2011 CET
From Federal Republic Progressionist Party
ToDebating the SR 023: Family Defense Act 3218
MessageNo. Everyone is equal and only a fool would think differently.

Date00:04:14, November 26, 2011 CET
From Federal Republic Progressionist Party
ToDebating the SR 023: Family Defense Act 3218
MessageThe ULC's bill actually prevents laws like this from passing. (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=328831)

Date00:44:40, November 26, 2011 CET
From United Liberal Caucus
ToDebating the SR 023: Family Defense Act 3218
MessageThis hardly defends "the family" and I challenge the Conservative Party to state how this is helpful to our society.

Date10:42:29, November 26, 2011 CET
From Pink Party!
ToDebating the SR 023: Family Defense Act 3218
MessageThe current laws defend 'the family', these proposals simply go against families and alienate minorities.

Date12:01:44, November 26, 2011 CET
From United National Front
ToDebating the SR 023: Family Defense Act 3218
MessageAlthough we strongly oppose article 3, we will vote for this bill. But in case if this bill gets passed we will introduce a new bill to repeal article 3.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 310

no
   

Total Seats: 115

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with.

    Random quote: "It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required." - Winston Churchill

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 71