We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Re-Starting Up the Supreme Court - Associate Justice Phillips.
Details
Submitted by[?]: United National Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 3219
Description[?]:
| Name : Eric Phillips Age : 52 Experience : Tesuhen State Law school graduate. Worked as the Chief Legal Advisor to the UNF for 12 years. Mr. Phillips is known for being one of the key figures who guided the UNF to become a gathering point for moderates. He supports government intervention on the market and works hard to protect family values. He is pro life and believes in a reasonable approach towards protecting the environment. He prefers not to be labeled as a conservative or a liberal. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:33:16, November 26, 2011 CET | From | Federal Republic Progressionist Party | To | Debating the Re-Starting Up the Supreme Court - Associate Justice Phillips. |
| Message | We support his regulator and eco-friendly ideals. |
| Date | 19:49:44, November 26, 2011 CET | From | Federal Independent Party | To | Debating the Re-Starting Up the Supreme Court - Associate Justice Phillips. |
| Message | Mr. Phillips, My question for you is what is your stance on Solentian Traditionalism? That is, the enforcement and protection of existing culture, customs, offices, and other elements of government that keep the Federal Republic unscathed over time. Also, have you been nominated by Supreme President Hamilton? Or were you randomly proposed for consideration by the Senate? Thank you for your time and consideration. Federal Independent Minority Leader Michael Louvis |
| Date | 21:14:39, November 26, 2011 CET | From | Conservative Party of Solentia | To | Debating the Re-Starting Up the Supreme Court - Associate Justice Phillips. |
| Message | "Mr. Senate Warden, The CPS, acknowledging that Mr. Phillips' and Mr. Hennington's nominations will likely pass regardless of our vote, have opted to vote no on each of their nominations as a symbolic gesture of our displeasure with the lack of time for questioning which was given to the Senate on each of their nominations before they were sent to vote. We support each based upon their biographies but must demand that in the future, legalities must be upheld. I yield." Jack Hawthorne, CPS Senatorial Lead |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 344 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 81 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: You can view who's online (i.e. been active the last 10 minutes) at the bottom of the menu (either at the top or the side). |
| Random quote: "I came, I saw, I conquered" - Julius Caesar |