We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of December 3222
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federal Republic Progressionist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 3223
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
As per the Constitution, the President chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the United Liberal Caucus
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the United Liberal Caucus
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the United Liberal Caucus
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Federal Republic Progressionist Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Federal Republic Progressionist Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Federal Republic Progressionist Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the United Liberal Caucus
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Federal Republic Progressionist Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Federal Republic Progressionist Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the United Liberal Caucus
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the United Liberal Caucus
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Federal Republic Progressionist Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 02:17:25, December 05, 2011 CET | From | Conservative Party of Solentia | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 3222 |
Message | "Mr. Senate Warden, So much for bipartisanship. At least the government now shows its true nature, a unilateral coalition without even a hint of compromise. I yield." Jack Hawthorne, CPS Senatorial Lead |
Date | 02:27:42, December 05, 2011 CET | From | United Liberal Caucus | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 3222 |
Message | The CPS his entirely hypocritical. They know full well that no national or unilateral coalition would have passed! What other option did the ULC-PSCP have? |
Date | 02:33:37, December 05, 2011 CET | From | Federal Republic Progressionist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 3222 |
Message | "With the FIP's stubborness running amuck, this was the only way to fill the empty seats of the cabinet. Until the FIP will stop acting so childish, the government will struggle to get by. And as Supreme President, I will do whatever I can to keep democracy from dieing. Even if it means hurting chances at bipartisanship, which was most lilkely not going to happen due to all of our seperate opinions." -Supreme President, Dillon Hamilton |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 215 | |||
no | Total Seats: 21 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 189 |
Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law. |
Random quote: "I like to pay taxes. With them I buy civilization." - Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. |