We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: New quota limits 2147
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2148
Description[?]:
in order to make this game more realistic and more enjoyable to everyone, I think we need new quotas for proposals. please think it over! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The number of proposals a party can introduce per year (will be handed out as a monthly quota).
Old value:: 20
Current: 20
Proposed: 10
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The maximum proposal quota a party can accumulate.
Old value:: 50
Current: 50
Proposed: 20
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 15:36:50, November 27, 2005 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the New quota limits 2147 |
Message | let the debate begin! we need 2/3 to change these, so I want everyone to voice their opinions! |
Date | 22:42:46, November 27, 2005 CET | From | BigBoss Party | To | Debating the New quota limits 2147 |
Message | why do you want to lower it? |
Date | 23:54:17, November 27, 2005 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the New quota limits 2147 |
Message | it is unreal to have 50 proposals at the same time, and i think it is a way to abuse the system. anyone can flood the parliament with bills now. |
Date | 00:05:44, November 28, 2005 CET | From | BigBoss Party | To | Debating the New quota limits 2147 |
Message | thats true at least even it out a bit to 15 article one is great as it is |
Date | 17:29:45, November 28, 2005 CET | From | Jelbanian Revolutionary Green Party | To | Debating the New quota limits 2147 |
Message | Aye...maybe 20? |
Date | 21:28:19, November 28, 2005 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the New quota limits 2147 |
Message | is 20 okay for everyone? |
Date | 03:46:02, November 29, 2005 CET | From | BigBoss Party | To | Debating the New quota limits 2147 |
Message | yea |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 24 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 48 |
Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left. |
Random quote: "The substance of the eminent Socialist gentlemen's speech is that making a profit is a sin. It is my belief that the real sin is taking a loss!" - Winston Churchill |