We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: AM Radical Libertarian Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3238
Description[?]:
In an increasingly uncertain world, we of Likitonia must have the most efficient military possible, with the least restrictions on how it is to be employed. While we are not planning agression, we must be prepared to do whatever necessary to defeat, or better yet, prevent it. It is with this in mind that the RLP introduces this modest proposal for military reform. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons if victory is not feasibile by other means.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in retaliation to any attack.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Women in the military.
Old value:: Women serve in segregated units.
Current: Women serve alongside men.
Proposed: Women serve alongside men.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:49:30, December 27, 2011 CET | From | National Communist Party | To | Debating the Military reform |
Message | Mr Speaker, If i may ask the RLP, what on earth they think they are doing!!! Article one of the this bill, is just absolutely outrageous! However my party will stand by the second article which will prove to promote equality throughout our proud nation. Untill article one is re-written we will not support this bill. |
Date | 02:34:28, December 28, 2011 CET | From | Reasonable Reforms Party | To | Debating the Military reform |
Message | Mr. Speaker, The RRP supports both proposals of this bill, as the military will still use appropriate caution before releasing nuclear weapons. Just because it is allowed doesn't mean our military will use these weapons without justified cause. |
Date | 06:29:48, December 28, 2011 CET | From | National Communist Party | To | Debating the Military reform |
Message | Mr Speaker, The RRP supports this bill... for what reason? If the Liberal Right want to regain some of their previous popularity with the public then they should re think what they stand for. Not only is this bad for the international community but puts are nation in a dangerous situation. I ask everyone to please vote against this bill. |
Date | 22:46:51, December 29, 2011 CET | From | AM Radical Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Military reform |
Message | Mr. Speaker, If the NCP can offer an example of irresponsibility justifying tying the hands of our noble military, we will be happy to reconsider Article 1 in light of it. Otherwise, we feel that our militayy leaders need the freedom to pursue any future actions in the best way possible. Our history shows that we have not engaged in expansionistic warfare in the past, nor is there any indication of these intents in the future. |
Date | 15:32:37, December 30, 2011 CET | From | National Communist Party | To | Debating the Military reform |
Message | Mr Speaker, It has nothing to do with the expansionist intentions of our nation. However if this legislation is passed and we have a future military leader with these idealogical impulses, then we are unable to defend our right as government to stop the use of nuclear warfare. We must pass legislation that protects the peoples interest and not the idea's of the right wing maniacs, who simply feel that flexing there military might is best for the nation. Stop this legislation! |
Date | 16:20:15, December 30, 2011 CET | From | United Workers | To | Debating the Military reform |
Message | These are good proposals. you shall have the UW support. We also appologise for the randomness of the last proposed Bill... We held a position of power, and wanted to increase party awareness... These proposals seem a good idea, firstly, we can have the first strike in nuclear war should we need to as a nation, and secondly, the women in the minitary is fair and just, and will increase the number of troops, while allowing an easy way of displaying national equality. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 7 | ||
no | Total Seats: 65 | ||
abstain |
Total Seats: 229 |
Random fact: If you want to know how many players there are in Particracy right now, check out the Game Statistics buried at the bottom of the World Map screen. |
Random quote: "A lie told often enough becomes the truth." - Vladimir Lenin |