We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Northern Seleyan Treaties Consolidation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Republics Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 3245
Description[?]:
| This bill will not be put to vote until after next election. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:54:57, January 15, 2012 CET |
From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Northern Seleyan Treaties Consolidation Act | | Message | This treaty is disturbing for several reasons. Article 3 would obligate us to intervene in Likatonia if the people rose up to topple that government. Even worse is the possibility that Likatonia could foment discord in Lodamun and use it as justification to invade. The treaty isn't even purely defensively in nation since it has a mandate to invade other countries who do not comply with the values.it outlines (article 6). Currently13 countries do not comply with treaty terms. Àre we expected to be at war with all of them under the obligations of this treaty? Finally, Lodamun is already a member of the Northern Delegate Alliance which is a far better treaty for purposes of defense. |
| Date | 20:45:32, January 18, 2012 CET |
From | Verde Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Northern Seleyan Treaties Consolidation Act | | Message | We believe that the importance of showing a united front between Lodamun and Likatonia against Valruzian hostilities takes presidence over a vaguely-worded pledge to intervene in the unlikely event of an internal revolt in Likatonia. The security of the Republics come first. |
| Date | 22:21:01, January 18, 2012 CET |
From | Democrats | To | Debating the Northern Seleyan Treaties Consolidation Act | | Message | VNP, there is a new Democratic government in Valruzia. Once the new cabinet is in place I intend to explore an agreement with the Valruzians to firm up our relationship in a positive manner. |
| Date | 00:21:32, January 19, 2012 CET |
From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Northern Seleyan Treaties Consolidation Act | | Message | The URp looked into this a bit by checking past bills there. Although Valruzia passed an economic embargo against Lodamun, it has been lifted. There currently seems to be no hostility there. Perhaps Valruzian entry to the North Seleya Alliance should be suggested to them. |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
| Vote |
Seats |
| yes | Total Seats: 73 |
| no | Total Seats: 27 |
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented |
| Random quote: "An independent is someone who wants to take the politics out of politics." - Adlai Stevenson
|