We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: God Hates Gays Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Classical Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2148
Description[?]:
| A BILL TO... save the children |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on sexual relations.
Old value:: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Current: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Proposed: Heterosexual relationships only are legal for consenting adults.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:41:04, November 28, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the God Hates Gays Act |
| Message | Your not supposed to vote no to your own bill....you have to vote yes, or else you'll get less votes. I believe voting against your own bill is much worse then abstaining from a bill. |
| Date | 01:41:48, November 28, 2005 CET | From | Classical Party | To | Debating the God Hates Gays Act |
| Message | awwww.......... you're kidding me |
| Date | 01:49:44, November 28, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the God Hates Gays Act |
| Message | It's ok...just try not to do this often. I'm sure one time won't hurt. |
| Date | 01:50:52, November 28, 2005 CET | From | Rationalist Party | To | Debating the God Hates Gays Act |
| Message | No, he's right, It'll hurt your coherency to vote against your own bill |
| Date | 01:58:37, November 28, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the God Hates Gays Act |
| Message | Yes so as said, i doubt one time wont hurt very much....but try not to do it again. |
| Date | 02:12:24, November 28, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party of Telamon | To | Debating the God Hates Gays Act |
| Message | i dont support homosexuals, BUT they do have some basic rights, even if there few |
| Date | 04:43:00, November 28, 2005 CET | From | Anti-Ownership Federation Party | To | Debating the God Hates Gays Act |
| Message | your theory: 1. God hates gays 2. God doesn't exist 3. God can't hate gays |
| Date | 15:43:18, November 28, 2005 CET | From | Telamon National Party | To | Debating the God Hates Gays Act |
| Message | yes there right to have sex with there own kind is only right. We would not agree to them having children and being allowed to marry. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 255 | |||||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The voters enjoy active parties who take upon themselves the initiative to create laws. |
| Random quote: "Politics: a strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. The conduct of public affairs for private advantage." - Ambrose Bierce |