Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 01:57:01
Server time: 14:02:58, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Brazil25 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Private Army Abolition Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Republics Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 3246

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:36:48, January 18, 2012 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Private Army Abolition Act
MessageI don't think any parties use this law to have a partisan army, buy this loophole to civil war should be closed now.

Date21:19:09, January 18, 2012 CET
FromVerde Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Private Army Abolition Act
MessageWe entirely agree. So long as paramilitaries are involved in politics, there will always be a threat of civil war. Whatever our differences, the political parties of Lodamun can resolve them on the Senate floor, not on the streets.

Date21:43:36, January 18, 2012 CET
FromLodamun Conservative Coalition
ToDebating the Private Army Abolition Act
MessageI think most of us are experience players, causing a civil war in our great country because they dont agree with something would be silly. We should all discuss our problems in our legislature debate floor.

Date00:12:09, January 19, 2012 CET
FromBlack People's Party
ToDebating the Private Army Abolition Act
MessageWhat about Paramilitaries organized to protect you from the government? Just a general question because the BPP doesn't agree with political parties having them but what about our citizens that are organized for the protection against tyranny/foreign invasion?

Date00:23:40, January 19, 2012 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Private Army Abolition Act
MessageI think they would be illegal under this law unless they were officially sanctioned by the government.

Date10:35:05, January 19, 2012 CET
FromFSD Party
ToDebating the Private Army Abolition Act
MessageThe NLF, as a military remake of the Nationalist Party that ruled Lodamun for over 100 years, maintains a large, fanatical paramilitary organisation - and as such, must vote against this bill for the purpose of maintaining a realistic role-play of the party's nature.

Date11:56:53, January 19, 2012 CET
FromDemocrats
ToDebating the Private Army Abolition Act
MessageIf the Blacks are militarised then we unfortunately will have to form our own group to deal with them.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 48

no
   

Total Seats: 52

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: "Spamming", or the indiscriminate posting of unsolicited messages, is not allowed.

    Random quote: "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong." - Voltaire

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 73