We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Private Army Abolition Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Republics Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3246
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government's position on paramilitaries.
Old value:: Paramilitaries are allowed as part of each political party.
Current: Paramilitaries are illegal and the recognized government may intervene freely to stop any possible activity.
Proposed: Paramilitaries are illegal and the recognized government may intervene freely to stop any possible activity.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:36:48, January 18, 2012 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Private Army Abolition Act |
Message | I don't think any parties use this law to have a partisan army, buy this loophole to civil war should be closed now. |
Date | 21:19:09, January 18, 2012 CET | From | Verde Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Private Army Abolition Act |
Message | We entirely agree. So long as paramilitaries are involved in politics, there will always be a threat of civil war. Whatever our differences, the political parties of Lodamun can resolve them on the Senate floor, not on the streets. |
Date | 21:43:36, January 18, 2012 CET | From | Lodamun Conservative Coalition | To | Debating the Private Army Abolition Act |
Message | I think most of us are experience players, causing a civil war in our great country because they dont agree with something would be silly. We should all discuss our problems in our legislature debate floor. |
Date | 00:12:09, January 19, 2012 CET | From | Black People's Party | To | Debating the Private Army Abolition Act |
Message | What about Paramilitaries organized to protect you from the government? Just a general question because the BPP doesn't agree with political parties having them but what about our citizens that are organized for the protection against tyranny/foreign invasion? |
Date | 00:23:40, January 19, 2012 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Private Army Abolition Act |
Message | I think they would be illegal under this law unless they were officially sanctioned by the government. |
Date | 10:35:05, January 19, 2012 CET | From | FSD Party | To | Debating the Private Army Abolition Act |
Message | The NLF, as a military remake of the Nationalist Party that ruled Lodamun for over 100 years, maintains a large, fanatical paramilitary organisation - and as such, must vote against this bill for the purpose of maintaining a realistic role-play of the party's nature. |
Date | 11:56:53, January 19, 2012 CET | From | Democrats | To | Debating the Private Army Abolition Act |
Message | If the Blacks are militarised then we unfortunately will have to form our own group to deal with them. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 48 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 52 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: "Spamming", or the indiscriminate posting of unsolicited messages, is not allowed. |
Random quote: "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong." - Voltaire |