We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Progressive Reform Bill - Elimination Of Government Waste In The Name Of Capitalism (i)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2151
Description[?]:
We propose to privatize many industries and end government involvement in many issues where it is not necessary and becomes a drain on our economy. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: The state owns all defence industries.
Current: The state owns all defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on energy generation.
Old value:: Small scale private electrical generation is permitted but most energy is generated by a government-owned company.
Current: Small scale private electrical generation is permitted but most energy is generated by a government-owned company.
Proposed: Private and public power stations exist side-by-side.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Health care policy.
Old value:: Health care is entirely public and free; private clinics are banned.
Current: There is a public health care system, but private clinics are allowed.
Proposed: There is a public health care system, but private clinics are allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:41:42, November 29, 2005 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Progressive Reform Bill - Elimination Of Government Waste In The Name Of Capitalism (i) |
Message | This seems less like a coherent agenda, and more like a direct rebuttal to AAS policy... The AAS opposes. There are certain sectors of Likatonian industry that are too IMPORTANT to be left to the caprices of market climates. |
Date | 14:58:04, November 29, 2005 CET | From | AM Radical Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Progressive Reform Bill - Elimination Of Government Waste In The Name Of Capitalism (i) |
Message | The RLP opposes only because these do not go far enough - we hav proposed a series of economic reform acts to increase freedom of choice. |
Date | 20:20:25, December 04, 2005 CET | From | Front for State Prosperity | To | Debating the Progressive Reform Bill - Elimination Of Government Waste In The Name Of Capitalism (i) |
Message | Immoral, unethical, poison pill bill. Darn you. You're forcing the PCP to vote yes so that we can see options 2 and 3 go through, and making us vote against our stated position on Article 1. Even your bill title suggests this - "in the name of capitalism." Bah! We have capitalism in our party name, so you're blackmailing us into supporting. Well, we will. Our opposition to article 1 is far weaker than our support for articles 2 and 3. That doesn't make me happy about it though. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 281 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 184 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 35 |
Random fact: After 3 days (72 hours) your account will be inactivated by Moderation. If you want to be reactivated you can request reactivation located here: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4360 |
Random quote: "A prince never lacks legitimate reasons to break his promise." - Niccolo Machiavelli |