Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 01:03:16
Server time: 14:56:43, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AethanKal | itsjustgav | VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Progressive Reform Bill - Elimination Of Government Waste In The Name Of Capitalism (i)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Progressive Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2151

Description[?]:

We propose to privatize many industries and end government involvement in many issues where it is not necessary and becomes a drain on our economy.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:41:42, November 29, 2005 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Progressive Reform Bill - Elimination Of Government Waste In The Name Of Capitalism (i)
MessageThis seems less like a coherent agenda, and more like a direct rebuttal to AAS policy...

The AAS opposes. There are certain sectors of Likatonian industry that are too IMPORTANT to be left to the caprices of market climates.

Date14:58:04, November 29, 2005 CET
FromAM Radical Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Progressive Reform Bill - Elimination Of Government Waste In The Name Of Capitalism (i)
MessageThe RLP opposes only because these do not go far enough - we hav proposed a series of economic reform acts to increase freedom of choice.

Date20:20:25, December 04, 2005 CET
FromFront for State Prosperity
ToDebating the Progressive Reform Bill - Elimination Of Government Waste In The Name Of Capitalism (i)
MessageImmoral, unethical, poison pill bill. Darn you. You're forcing the PCP to vote yes so that we can see options 2 and 3 go through, and making us vote against our stated position on Article 1. Even your bill title suggests this - "in the name of capitalism." Bah! We have capitalism in our party name, so you're blackmailing us into supporting.

Well, we will. Our opposition to article 1 is far weaker than our support for articles 2 and 3. That doesn't make me happy about it though.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 281

no
   

Total Seats: 184

abstain
 

Total Seats: 35


Random fact: After 3 days (72 hours) your account will be inactivated by Moderation. If you want to be reactivated you can request reactivation located here: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4360

Random quote: "A prince never lacks legitimate reasons to break his promise." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64