We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: End Of National Internet Service Provider
Details
Submitted by[?]: Zionic Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 3255
Description[?]:
| I believe this is a way to save money on our federal budget. While also making more jobs by helping the private sector. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on internet service providers (ISPs).
Old value:: The state owns and operates a national internet service provider, alongside private ISPs.
Current: Private companies provide internet service throughout the nation, without government interference.
Proposed: Private companies provide internet service throughout the nation, without government interference.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:33:52, February 06, 2012 CET | From | Meritocratic Alliance | To | Debating the End Of National Internet Service Provider |
| Message | We tend to agree. Coverage by the private providers is superior and price competitive. If the situation should arise that prices run out of control, we could, of course, choose to subsidize the industry, but as it is, a nationalized data grid is no longer needed. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 425 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "No man can outrun a bullet." - Idi Amin |