We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Anti-Dundorf Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Nationalist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2150
Description[?]:
| For too Long, in the opinion of the Nationalist Party, have the sea and Harbours of Rutania been blocked by the Socialist scum of Dundolf. The un-democratic nation of Dundolf proposed this treaty to gain access to the Sea. a sea they do not own, nor care for, nor Govern. the Regime in Dundolf must not be given the access to our waters no longer. What advantage does it play to Rutania, except to be a Communist Puppet? The Waters need cleaning! We must act for Rutania. |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the Dundorf-Rutania Treaty of the Sea.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:57:24, November 29, 2005 CET | From |  Freedom Party | To | Debating the Anti-Dundorf Act |
| Message | We dont actually get anything out of this treaty, perhaps instead of using their surplus to buy norvastan, they can pay us for access |
| Date | 19:15:16, November 29, 2005 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Anti-Dundorf Act |
| Message | It gives us a trade advantage, we are "privileged partner" of Dundorf. We oppose any of the current suggestions as we feel that Dundorf too has the right to a reasonably-sized navy to defend and escort its merchant and fishery vessels, and to operate merchant and fishery vessels. If Rutania doesn't allow them to do access our ports for that purpose, they can always find another privileged partner. |
| Date | 20:55:21, November 29, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Anti-Dundorf Act |
| Message | How can we be a privileged partner? How can our companies trade with a country that bans private enterprise? They wouldnt allow them in to sell goods etc |
| Date | 23:22:33, November 29, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Imperialist Party | To | Debating the Anti-Dundorf Act |
| Message | Even if they buy Norvastan, they still need to get things from mainland Dundorf to Norvastan. It doesnt actually solve anything. I dont think they've thought it through. |
| Date | 13:42:43, November 30, 2005 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Anti-Dundorf Act |
| Message | Surely you are not that stupid? |
| Date | 17:49:03, November 30, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Anti-Dundorf Act |
| Message | If they want to transport goods between norvastan and dundorf, they need our ports. So what on earth are you on about? And answer my points, unless you dont have any valid points |
| Date | 22:26:11, December 01, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Imperialist Party | To | Debating the Anti-Dundorf Act |
| Message | "Surely you are not that stupid?" ...? Are you drunk? |
| Date | 22:29:36, December 06, 2005 CET | From | Kommunistische Arbeitspartei | To | Debating the Anti-Dundorf Act |
| Message | Your disgusting nation will be destroyed once the last capitalists are removed from our country. Have a nice day! |
| Date | 22:32:37, December 06, 2005 CET | From | Kommunistische Arbeitspartei | To | Debating the Anti-Dundorf Act |
| Message | Oh, and by the way: Dundorfian ships will remain in your harbors at this time. Any attacks on them or attempts to remove them will be regarded as an act of war. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 306 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 150 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 143 |
| Random fact: Real-life quotations may be used in Particracy, but the real-life speaker or author should always be referenced in an OOC (out-of-character) note alongside the quotation. |
| Random quote: "Modern technology owes ecology an apology." - Alan M. Eddison |