Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 00:20:12
Server time: 15:39:47, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): ADM Drax | Ahmad | Brazil25 | HopesFor | Liu Che | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Legal Economics Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Traxian Imperial Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2149

Description[?]:

The aim of this bill is to reduce the amount of people taking advantage of our legal system for personal gain, creating a compensation culture and harming our economy.
Point 1: If people who are charged with a crime, there must be susbataintial evidence. Those who cannot afford a defence and are truely guilty do not deserve for the government to give them one. Those who are on a low-income and are innocent will not go to court in the first place is they act within societies boarders and if there is little evidence of involvement. If on the off chance an innocent person does go to court then the due process of the law will discover this. We do not need to encurage low-income citizens to commit crime on the basis 'the government will get 'em off'.
Point 2: If a rumour goes round around a doctor giving suspicious advice there is always one person who will take that doctor to court for he money, and even if the allegation is proved false the doctor's reputation is damaged irrevesably and we have lost a dedicated proffesional. Therefore any cases must to taken to a medical regulating body, where they can decide if the doctor broke the law where the media will not find out and where there is less chance of the person claiming damages is given a substantial amount of money.
Point 3: The lawsuit law should be changed to cap it for medical bills and legal expenses. This will again reduce the amount of claimaints who enter cases just to win lots of money. The only true damage to a person that another should pay for is any medical bills arising due to the incident that produced the claim, and the legal expenses.

In all people should not go to courts for money they should go for justice, and there will be no true justice until the laws are changed.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:01:08, November 29, 2005 CET
FromNational Democratic Party
ToDebating the Legal Economics Bill
MessageWe disagree with this bill.

Date14:31:41, November 29, 2005 CET
FromProgressive Imperial Party
ToDebating the Legal Economics Bill
MessageWe agree with 2 and 3, but disagree with article 1, and will consequently vote no.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 135

no
    

Total Seats: 274

abstain
 

Total Seats: 32


Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there.

Random quote: "Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people." - Karl Marx

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 58