Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 00:37:44
Server time: 15:22:15, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): Arusu-Gad | Arusu-Weareback | burgerboys | HawkDun | itsjustgav | LC73DunMHP | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: M.A.R.C. Special Ordinance: "Establishment of the Pontesi Monarchy"

Details

Submitted by[?]: Medrisite-Associated Revisionist Council

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 3274

Description[?]:

OOC:

Okay, the N.L.A. and I are both in favor of installing the House of Mederagaar back to the throne. I have little faith that both the O.N.C.P. and the Democrat Party will support anything other than the restoration of the House of Belknap. The House of Mederagaar took command of the failing Pontesi state after the House of Belknap was dissolved. Likewise, The House of Mederagaar took command of the resistance against the Selucian interlopers. Without us, there would be no independent Pontesi nation, and very likely no Ptnek people.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:21:22, February 23, 2012 CET
From Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the M.A.R.C. Special Ordinance: "Establishment of the Pontesi Monarchy"
MessageOOC: The Belknap Family have been a part of Pontesian History since 2574 and have defended Pontesi from Zionist Imperialist and Selucian Aggression for more then 500 years.

It is unlikely that we will find a solution to this problem quickly so instead of rushing to a conflict, I propose that we continue with the HoS election, but change the title to the Steward of the Realm. We can RP that the Steward is elected to safeguard the throne like the Steward of Gondor in the Lord of the Ring.

Or we could always have political fight, that should be fun. As long as we don't make it into a civil war.

Date17:40:24, February 23, 2012 CET
From One Nation Conservative Party
ToDebating the M.A.R.C. Special Ordinance: "Establishment of the Pontesi Monarchy"
MessageWe support the Democrat Party's position.

Date18:42:22, February 23, 2012 CET
From Medrisite-Associated Revisionist Council
ToDebating the M.A.R.C. Special Ordinance: "Establishment of the Pontesi Monarchy"
MessageOOC:

Actually, I was considering merging the two houses with some sort of royal wedding. Or, perhaps a joint Monarchy along the lines of the Glorious Revolution in England. Frankly, I don't really feel the need to rush to a civil war so soon after the last.

Date00:12:07, February 24, 2012 CET
From Cirichád Déofolwítga
ToDebating the M.A.R.C. Special Ordinance: "Establishment of the Pontesi Monarchy"
MessageTo the August Parliament of the Cedar Throne, the Pontesi Realm

Honourable Members of Parliament,

The Imperial Government of Davostan would like to ensure the rightful House of Mederagaar of it's support, should need ever arise. Even though we still do not recognize any legitimate authority in Selucian Pontesi but the leaders of the Union of Imperial Crusader Kingdoms, there is no viable crusader movement in the area as for current, and the opposition has no right in the world to try to restore the weak and incompetent Belknaps. By our Unholy Morals, these lands are yours, you conquered them by force no matter if we preferred the rule of our allies. We shall gladly slaughter any rebels in your name.

Signed,
Caspar Shroudsoul
Foreign Minister of the Unholy Davostan Empire

Date05:20:27, February 24, 2012 CET
From Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the M.A.R.C. Special Ordinance: "Establishment of the Pontesi Monarchy"
MessageAs this is Pontesi internal affairs, I respectfully ask the Foreign Minister of the Unholy Davostan Empire to keep his unnecessary and largely idiotic comment to himself as we could care less about what he thinks on the situation. I also call for the current government to adopt the same stand as this is about Pontesi and we see no reason to involve foreigners into our discussion less it could be accused of a puppet of Davostan.

Jonathan Spencer MP

Date15:24:01, February 24, 2012 CET
From Cirichád Déofolwítga
ToDebating the M.A.R.C. Special Ordinance: "Establishment of the Pontesi Monarchy"
MessageTo Mr Jonathan Spencer, member of the illegitimate Pontesi parliament

There is no such thing as Pontesi internal affairs, as Pontesi affairs are all sovereign nation's affairs. The very existence of the Pontesi Hegemony is a threat to all those who do not wish the existence of their country bought to an end by treason and rebellion, as the Crusader Union was. However, as we do not wish another example of how justice and law and order can be toppled by traitorous rebels, we are ready to intervene and slaughter those who would rebel against the House of Mederagaar. The Belknap's place is in a history book.

Signed,
Caspar Shroudsoul
Foreign Minister of the Unholy Davostan Empire

Date17:05:35, February 24, 2012 CET
From Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the M.A.R.C. Special Ordinance: "Establishment of the Pontesi Monarchy"
MessageEach sovereign nation will always have it's own internal affairs, but judging by the words that I have read from you then I'm afraid I have to said that the concept is perhaps simply too difficult for you to understand. In this case, I will make it simple. Pontesi will decide on it's own whether if it's returning to a monarchy or which Monarchy will it accepts as it's leader.

There is no place for Davostan or the Crusaders in this discussion and the longer you continue to interfere, the more the concern that I have on whether the Crusaders and Davostan is deliberately in league or manipulating with some faction in Pontesi.

Jonathan Spencer MP

Date05:05:08, March 16, 2012 CET
From Medrisite-Associated Revisionist Council
ToDebating the M.A.R.C. Special Ordinance: "Establishment of the Pontesi Monarchy"
MessageOOC:

This was an accidental vote.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes

    Total Seats: 0

    no
      

    Total Seats: 43

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 33


    Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law.

    Random quote: "The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." - Thomas Jefferson

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 64