We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Boundary Reform Bill, 3269
Details
Submitted by[?]: Luthori Tory Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 3269
Description[?]:
| Redressing the current imbalance in legislative representation and assuring a more balanced assembly. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The total number of seats in the legislative assembly. Should be between 75 and 750.
Old value:: 105
Current: 650
Proposed: 649
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:59:06, March 06, 2012 CET | From | Luthori Tory Party | To | Debating the Boundary Reform Bill, 3269 |
| Message | OOC: The House of Commons currently has 650 MPs, but this would actually make a majority rather difficult in Particracy, and in any case, one of those seats is held by the Speaker, and therefore isn't contested. Hence 649 seats. |
| Date | 17:06:57, March 06, 2012 CET | From | Constitutionalist Imperial League (IA) | To | Debating the Boundary Reform Bill, 3269 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, We support a change to a 200 or 2001 member legislature but this is abusive. I yield. |
| Date | 17:13:17, March 06, 2012 CET | From | Constitutionalist Imperial League (IA) | To | Debating the Boundary Reform Bill, 3269 |
| Message | ADDENDUM: 201 not 2001. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 95 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 10 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Before creating a party organisation, check to see whether there are any existing organisations which cover the same agenda. |
| Random quote: "The more you observe politics, the more you've got to admit that each party is worse than the other." - Will Rogers |