Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5474
Next month in: 00:55:25
Server time: 11:04:34, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: 3273 Health Reforms

Details

Submitted by[?]: Beluz Democratic Karavist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 3273

Description[?]:

Health reforms for the upcoming year.

We see no reason to discount contraceptives; we would be taking money from each citizen to go to a cause that will benefit the few. Many persons are against contraceptives for religious reasons; it would be unfair to take their money to put to a cause which they neither support nor benefit from.

In the same way, we are opposed to religion being tax-free, because religious institutions occupy land without paying taxes, when the land could be used for something else, either beneficial to all invidividuals, and if not so, the occupation of the land would at least be paid for, so the people would benefit.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:53:01, March 13, 2012 CET
FromCongress Federation
ToDebating the 3273 Health Reforms
MessageThe first and last look kind of funky, ill let the first get away for now but not the last proposal. Freedom of religion yes but i'm not having an outbreak of smallpox because some person decides to opt out because of religion, simply put every child must be vaccinated.

Date17:04:55, March 13, 2012 CET
From Beluz Democratic Karavist Party
ToDebating the 3273 Health Reforms
MessageMr. Speaker,

In regards to Article 9 (the last proposal), you should try to compare the current law to the one being proposed; which do you prefer?

Date17:08:18, March 13, 2012 CET
FromCongress Federation
ToDebating the 3273 Health Reforms
MessageWhy not just have a blanket mandate? If protecting the general populace means "impeding" on religion then go for it. The good of the many must come before the few

Date17:12:19, March 13, 2012 CET
From Beluz Democratic Karavist Party
ToDebating the 3273 Health Reforms
MessageAgain, I insist you focus on the comparison.

A blanket mandate would impede on civil rights.

Date17:16:31, March 13, 2012 CET
FromCongress Federation
ToDebating the 3273 Health Reforms
MessageSo when we lose one million people to a new strand of smallpox because Jane wasn't vaccinated what will you say then? It is about minimizing risk. Cant shout fire in a crowded room, that's disturbance etc., all liberties have their boundaries

Date17:24:42, March 13, 2012 CET
From Beluz Democratic Karavist Party
ToDebating the 3273 Health Reforms
MessageSo the current law is better?

Date17:39:14, March 13, 2012 CET
FromCongress Federation
ToDebating the 3273 Health Reforms
Messageno the current is not better but why not ask for a blanket mandate regardless of religion, one must think of the greater public body

Date17:40:50, March 13, 2012 CET
From Beluz Democratic Karavist Party
ToDebating the 3273 Health Reforms
MessageI think it would be best for your party to suggest that.

Date17:48:17, March 13, 2012 CET
FromCongress Federation
ToDebating the 3273 Health Reforms
Messageok i get you in that respect the proposal seems reasonable

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 528

no
 

Total Seats: 222

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections.

    Random quote: "Whatever crushes individuality is despotism, by whatever name it may be called and whether it professes to be enforcing the will of God or the injunctions of men." - John Stuart Mill

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 95