We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: House of Hepburn Bill 001
Details
Submitted by[?]: House of Hepburn
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3286
Description[?]:
Countess Clarice of the House of Hepburn proposes the following articles to be passed in this bill. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Tax percentage of the profit made by corporations.
Old value:: 25
Current: 10
Proposed: 15
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Food and beverage labeling regulations.
Old value:: Companies are encouraged by the government to label food and beverage products.
Current: Companies must clearly label food and beverage products, in a manner that can be easily understood.
Proposed: Companies must clearly label food and beverage products, in a manner that can be easily understood.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Food safety policy.
Old value:: Local governments determine food safety standards.
Current: The government introduces, and actively enforces, food standards provisions.
Proposed: The government introduces, and actively enforces, food standards provisions.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Sale of tobacco products.
Old value:: The sale of tobacco products is regulated by local governments
Current: There are certain restrictions on the sale of tobacco and only adults may purchase tobacco.
Proposed: There are certain restrictions on the sale of tobacco and only adults may purchase tobacco.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:33:24, April 07, 2012 CET | From | Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the House of Hepburn Bill 001 |
Message | Madame Countess, with plans for such harsh economic conditions, corporations may leave Beluzia to go elsewhere. We need corporations for jobs. Are you sure you want to be a Socialist? |
Date | 21:35:16, April 07, 2012 CET | From | Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the House of Hepburn Bill 001 |
Message | Is it not best that we leave certain laws for local governments to decide? There are 5 parishes, Madame. What about the parishes that prefer less regulation? |
Date | 21:37:50, April 07, 2012 CET | From | House of Hepburn | To | Debating the House of Hepburn Bill 001 |
Message | Bah. The parishes. 5 of them you say? Why should we let them decide? They want less government, that is quite unfair to our power. If we show them that we will give up some power, soon riots will start because they know they can take advantage. All we need is to show them we will waver just a tad before they rip us off of our feet. We need to stand firm on our national policies. |
Date | 21:39:10, April 07, 2012 CET | From | House of Hepburn | To | Debating the House of Hepburn Bill 001 |
Message | Bah. The parishes. 5 of them you say? Why should we let them decide? They want less government, that is quite unfair to our power. If we show them that we will give up some power, soon riots will start because they know they can take advantage. All we need is to show them we will waver just a tad before they rip us off of our feet. We need to stand firm on our national policies. |
Date | 21:45:07, April 07, 2012 CET | From | Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the House of Hepburn Bill 001 |
Message | There is already a coup in progress, Madame. Watch your mouth if you wish to survive. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes |
Total Seats: 0 | ||
no |
Total Seats: 750 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law. |
Random quote: "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator." - George W. Bush |