We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of December 2148
Details
Submitted by[?]: Movement for White Supremacy
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2149
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Liberty and Prosperity Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Liberty and Prosperity Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the United Dolgaria Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the United Dolgaria Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Movement for White Supremacy
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Movement for White Supremacy
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Alianse Progresivitāte
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Movement for White Supremacy
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the United Dolgaria Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Alianse Progresivitāte
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Liberty and Prosperity Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Alianse Progresivitāte
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Liberty and Prosperity Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 06:55:46, December 01, 2005 CET | From | Alianse Progresivitāte | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2148 |
Message | I'll vote for any cabinet that doesn't include monarchy, but I'd prefer to stay out of the cabinet while my party is busy refocusing its policies. |
Date | 07:32:34, December 01, 2005 CET | From | Movement for White Supremacy | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2148 |
Message | well, youre in it. so... we need you to vote yes regardless. plus, I picked the cabinet posts for you because you are the most "sympathetic" (with the exception of LPP, who really doesnt apply to those posts) of the entire coalition. |
Date | 07:32:55, December 01, 2005 CET | From | Movement for White Supremacy | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2148 |
Message | even if you were still the DNCP, we would still have you in the cabinet. |
Date | 21:16:47, December 01, 2005 CET | From | Dolgarian Imperial Revivalists | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2148 |
Message | Well there are interesting things going on with NATO at the moment, specifically the threat posed by New Endralon. So with that in mind, I would actually vote in favour of any government that includes the DUP s Foreign Secretary and ideally the MoD, regadless of the composition of the rest of cabinet, or divisions over policies and so on. These can all be argued over as seperate issues, as well the security of Dolgaria is of more import than petty party rivalries. |
Date | 05:28:34, December 02, 2005 CET | From | Movement for White Supremacy | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2148 |
Message | I am pretty sure that CPD is tougher on defense than almost everyone here, myself included (with the exception of CU maybe) |
Date | 05:31:55, December 02, 2005 CET | From | Movement for White Supremacy | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2148 |
Message | Plus, like I said in countless other bills, the game has no script for terrorism, border problems, military attacks, etc. When the time comes, the CC is all in favor of emergency wartime powers/spending. Until then, we can just "chill" And like I said before, our defense budget is more than twice that of New Endralon's, last time we spoke about it. You set an "optimal" and comfortable level of defense spending yourself DUP, and I think everyone was happy to support it. regardless, these are issues we probably do not need to worry about immediately. Plus, I know one of the mods for the game, and he is looking for an excuse to punish New endralon for invading or threatening invasion... |
Date | 08:24:12, December 02, 2005 CET | From | Dolgarian Imperial Revivalists | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2148 |
Message | Not at all, no other party can claim to be as defence oriented as the DUP. Defence has been the cornerstone of DUP policy for a very long time indeed. So much so that I imagine that defence contractors are major supporters of the party, and the membership and leadership are made up of lots of ex-servicemen and women. And if what you say about that Mod that you know is true, well then he/she is a very bad mod indeed.... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 336 | |||
no | Total Seats: 186 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 228 |
Random fact: Moderation will not approve a Cultural Protocol request within the first 48 hours of it being requested. This is in order to give other players a chance to query the proposed changes, if they wish to do so. Moderation may be approached for advice on a proposed change, but any advice proffered should always be understood under the provisio that no final decision will be made until at least 48 hours after the request has been formally submitted for approval. |
Random quote: "If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all." - Noam Chomsky |